Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T16:04:25.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Snaketown IV vs. The Facts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Albert H. Schroeder
Albert H. Schroeder*
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Boulder City, Nevada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1937 Gila Pueblo reported on its excavations at Snaketown, a large Hohokam site in southern Arizona, in which a time range from 300 B.C. to 1100 A.D. was assigned (Gladwin, et al, 1937). Gladwin (1942) then presented a revision, based on his own comparative treering research, in which he raised the beginning date for the site up to 600 A.D. In his latest publication Gladwin (1948) brings a second revision in which additional time and cultural alterations are offered. These are again based on his own dendrochronological studies. These results he correlates in turn, on a broad scale, with the Mogollon development.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , January 1951 , pp. 263 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gladwin, Harold S., Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Gladwin, N. 1937. “Excavations at Snaketown,, I: Material Culture.” Medallion Papers XXV. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Harold S. 1942. “Excavations at Snaketown, III: Revisions.” Medallion Papers XXX. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Harold S. 1948. “Excavations at Snaketown, IV: Revisions and Conclusions.” Medallion Papers XXXVIII. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
Lehmer, Donald J. 1950. Review, American Anthropologist, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 415–418. Menasha.Google Scholar
Woodward, Arthur 1950. Review, American Antiquity, Vol. XVI, No. 2, pp. 172–173. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar