Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T22:37:42.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in North American Rock Art Research: A Quantitative Evaluation of the Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Klaus F. Wellmann
Klaus F. Wellmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Beekman Downtown Hospital, 170 William Street, New York, NY 10038
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature to 1979 on North American Indian rock art has been analyzed. It was found to be characterized by a high degree of dispersion, an erratic growth pattern before 1950 followed by an exponential mode of growth thereafter, and a low proportion of multiple-author works. The growth in literary output over the years was largely attributable to an increase in the number of authors, whereas the article/author ratio changed only slightly with time. The proportion of works dealing with general topics rose from 16.4% before 1970 to 41.6% thereafter while the proportion of site reports decreased accordingly. Although all rock art regions participated in the numerical growth of the literature over the decades, their relative proportions varied with time. The Southwest, the Great Plains, and the Eastern Woodland had the greatest number of works with regional emphasis; these three regions accounted for more than 50% of the total literary output. As an instrument of scientific information exchange, the rock art literature in North America appears to be in a comparatively early stage of development and maturation, a feature it shares with the communication system in the social sciences in general.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1980 , pp. 531 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bradford, S. C. 1948 Documentation. Crosby Lockwood, London.Google Scholar
Chernin, Eli 1975 A worm's-eye view of biomedical journals. Federation Proceedings 34:124-130.Google Scholar
Clarke, Beverly L. 1967 Communications patterns of biomedical scientists. I. Multiple authorship and sponsorship of Federation Program volunteer papers. Federation Proceedings 26:1288-1291.Google Scholar
Garvey, William D., Lin, Nan, and Nelson, Carnot E. 1970 Communication in the physical and the social sciences. Science 170:1166-1173.Google Scholar
Goffman, William, and Warren, Kenneth S. 1969 Dispersion of papers among journals based on a mathematical analysis of two diverse medicalliteratures. Nature 221:1205-1207.Google Scholar
Grant, Campbell 1967 Rock art of the American Indian. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
Roland, Charles G., and Kirkpatrick, Richard A. 1975 Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences. New England Journal of Medicine 292:1273-1276.Google Scholar
Warren, Kenneth S., and Goffman, William 1972 The ecology of the medical literatures. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 263:267-273.Google Scholar
Wellmann, Klaus F. 1978 A bibliography of North American Indian rock art. The Artifact 16(1):1-109.Google Scholar
Wellmann, Klaus F. 1979a A survey of North American Indian rock art. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
Wellmann, Klaus F. 1979b A bibliography of North American Indian rock art: first supplement. The Artifact 17(4):1-45.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. M. 1969 Information, communication, knowledge. Nature 224:318-324.Google Scholar