Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:18:52.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earl Warren and the American Judicial Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Michael E. Parrish
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
American Bar Foundation Research Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Fall 1982 , pp. 1179 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 G. Edward White, Earl Warren: A Public Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

2 See, e.g., White, G. Edward, The Intellectual Origins of Torts in America, 86 Yale L.J. 671 (1977).Google Scholar

3 G. Edward White, The American Judicial Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

4 Melvyn I. Urofsky, A Mind of One Piece: Brandeis and American Reform (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1971).Google Scholar

5 White, supra note 1, at 105.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 34–43.Google Scholar

7 Id. at 58–67.Google Scholar

8 Id. at 67–74.Google Scholar

9 Id. at 112–25.Google Scholar

10 Id. at 72.Google Scholar

11 Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895).Google Scholar

12 Adkins v. Children's Hosp., 261 U.S. 525 (1923).Google Scholar

13 Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918).Google Scholar

14 United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936).Google Scholar

15 Thayer, James B., The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (1893).Google Scholar

16 Felix Frankfurter, Hours of Labor and Realism in Constitutional Law, 29 Harv. L. Rev. 353 (1916).Google Scholar

17 See Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 74 (1905) (Holmes, J., dissenting); and Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 341 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring).Google Scholar

18 Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 412 (1923) (Holmes, J., dissenting); and West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 646 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

19 Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357, 372 (1927) (Brandeis, Jr., concurring); and United States v. Carolene Prods. Co., 304 U.S. 144, 153 n.4 (1938).Google Scholar

20 See Ferguson v. Skrupa, 372 U.S. 726 (1963); Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 68 (1948) (Black, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

21 Brown v. Board of Educ. of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), and 349 U.S. 294 (1955).Google Scholar

22 Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).Google Scholar

23 Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).Google Scholar

24 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).Google Scholar

25 In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar

26 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar

27 White, supra note 1, at 225.Google Scholar

28 Boiling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954).Google Scholar

29 Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958).Google Scholar

30 Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).Google Scholar

31 Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).Google Scholar

32 Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968).Google Scholar

33 White, supra note 1, at 359.Google Scholar

34 See, e.g., Justice Chase's famous opinion in Calder v. Bull, I U.S. 269, 3 Dallas 386 (1798).Google Scholar