Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T12:19:53.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Limits of Liberalism: Wrong to Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1986 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 J.S. Mill, On Liberty 10–11 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1975).Google Scholar

2 See Joel Feinberg, Abortion, in Tom Regan, ed., Matters of Life and Death 182 (New York: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar

3 Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).Google Scholar

4 Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).Google Scholar

5 Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 255 (1957).Google Scholar

6 Compare Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), with Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).Google Scholar

7 Or, of course, patent infringements, breaches of express trust, racketeer-influenced corrupt organizational activity, or what not.Google Scholar

8 Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 It is Judge Posner's. See Posner, An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 85 Colum. L. Rev. 1193 (1985).Google Scholar

10 G. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law xix (Boston: Little, Brown, 1978) (emphasis added).Google Scholar