Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T17:36:25.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Income effects of limiting soil erosion under organic, conventional, and no-till systems in eastern Pennsylvania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

Jean L. Domanico ,
Patrick Madden  and
Earl J. Partenheimer
Jean L. Domanico
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Patrick Madden
Affiliation:
Professors of Economics in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Earl J. Partenheimer
Affiliation:
Professors of Economics in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Get access

Abstract

A 294-acre Pennsylvania crop and livestock farm was modeled under alternative management practices using linear programming. The management practices included conventional, organic, and no-till production, with and without the use of overseeding and cover crops. For each of the management practices, soil erosion was estimated using the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Profitability was compared across the options with and without constraints on soil erosion. Prior to constraining soil erosion, no-till was found to be the most profitable option. The conventional option was next most profitable, followed closely by the organic option. The use of cover crops or overseeding was found to be unprofitable when high levels of soil erosion were allowed. When soil erosion was constrained, the relative profitability of the options changed. It was found that practices that can control erosion with the least reduction in the intensity of rotation, such as planting cover crops, overseeding and no-till, are the most profitable options when soil is constrained to below 5 tons per acre. No-till remained the most profitable option at low levels of soil erosion. The economic advantage of conventional over organic production diminished as soil erosion was constrained. Below 5 tons per acre of soil erosion, the organic system became more profitable than the conventional system. It was found that use of overseeding or cover crops makes a more profitable rotation possible at low levels of soil erosion.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Spring 1986 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American Society of Agronomy. 1982. Determinants of soil loss tolerance. Special Publ. No. 45. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2.Baker, J. L. and Laflen, J. M.. 1983. Water quality consequences of conservation tillage. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(3):186–193.Google Scholar
3.Crosson, P. R. 1982. The Cropland Crisis-Myth or Reality? The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
4.Crosson, P. R. and Stout, A.. 1983. Productivity effects of cropland erosion in the United States. Research paper from Resources for the Future. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
5.Crowder, B. M., Epp, D. J., Pionke, H. B., Young, C. E., Beierlien, J. G., and Partenheimer, E. J.. 1984. The effects on farm income of constraining soil and plant nutrient losses: An application of the CREAMS simulation model. Bulletin 850. The Pennsylvania State Univ., Agric. Expt. Station, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
6.Culik, M. N., McAllister, J., Palada, M. C., and Reiger, S.. 1983. The Kutztown farm report – A study of a low-input crop/livestock farm. Regenerative Agric. Tech. Bulletin, Rodale Research Center, Kutztown, PA.Google Scholar
7.Doll, F. P. and Orazem, F.. 1984. Production Economics: Theory with Application. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
8.Domanico, J. L. 1985. Income effects of limiting soil erosion under alternative farm management systems: A simulation and optimization analysis of a Penn sylvania crop and livestock farm. Unpublished M.S. thesis. The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.Google Scholar
9.Dum, S. A., Hughes, F. A., Cooper, J. G., Kelly, B. W., and Crowley, V. E.. 1977. The Penn State Farm Management Handbook, College of Agriculture, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.Google Scholar
10.Epplin, F. M., Tice, T. F., Handke, S. J., Peeper, T. F., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr., 1983. Economics of conservation tillage systems for winter wheat production in Oklahoma. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(3):294–297.Google Scholar
11.Forster, D. L., Logan, T. J., Yaksich, S. M., and Adams, J. R.. 1985. An accelerated implementation program for reducing the diffuse-source phosphorous load to Lake Erie. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 40(1):136–141.Google Scholar
12.Harker, J. M. and Michalson, E. J.. 1976. Estimating the economics of erosion using USLE. In: Soil Erosion: Prediction and Control. Proceedings of a National Conference on Soil Erosion, Purdue Univ.Google Scholar
13.Hinkle, M. K. 1983. Problems with conservation tillage. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(3):214–216.Google Scholar
14.Hinman, H. R., Mohasci, S. G., and Young, D. L.. 1983. Impact of tensure status on economic incentives for conservation tillage. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(4):287–290.Google Scholar
15.Hofstetter, R. 1983. Progress report – Overseeding 1982. Agronomy Dept., Rodale Research Center, RRC/AG-83/29.Google Scholar
16.Jolly, R. W., Edwards, W. M., and Erbach, D. C.. 1983. Economics of conservation tillage in Iowa. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(4):291–294.Google Scholar
17.Klepper, R., Lockeretz, W., Commoner, B., Gertler, M., Fast, S., O'Leary, D., and Blobaum, R.. 1977. Economic performance and energy intensiveness on organic and conventional farms in the Corn Belt: A preliminary comparison, pp. 1–12. Amer. J. Agric. Econ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Knisel, W. G. and Nicks, A. D.. 1980. Introduction, CREAMS: A field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. Research Report No. 26, Vol. 1, Chap. 1, Agricultural Research Service, USDA.Google Scholar
19.Krog, D. R., Bhide, S., Pope, C. A. III, and Heady, E. O.. 1983. Effects of livestock enterprises on the economics of soil and water conservation practices in Iowa. CARD Report 112, SWCP Series V, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
20.Langley, J. A., Heady, E. O., and Olson, K. D.. 1982. The macro implications of a complete transformation of U.S. agricultural production to organic farming practices. CARD Paper 82–9, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
21.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Kohl, D. H., and Klepper, R. W.. 1984. Comparison of organic and conventional farming in the Corn Belt. In: Organic Farming: Current Technology and its Role in Sustainable Agriculture, Bezdicek, B. F. and Power, J. F. (eds.), pp. 37–48. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
22.Lockeretz, W. and Wernick, S.. 1980. Commerical organic farming in the Corn Belt in comparison to conventional practices. Rural Sociology 45(4):708–722.Google Scholar
23.Lockeretz, W., Klepper, R., Commoner, B., Gertler, M., Fast, S., O'Leary, D., and Blobaum, R.. 1975. A comparison of production, economic returns and energy intensiveness of Corn Belt farms that do and do not use inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Martin, G. W. and Touchton, J. T.. 1983. Legumes as a cover crop and source of nitrogen. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(3):214–216.Google Scholar
25.McCormack, D. E., Young, K. K., and Kimberlin, L. W.. 1982. Current criteria for determining soil loss tolerance, pp. 95–110. Special Publ. No. 45., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
26.National Research Council. 1976. Nutrient Requirements for Beef Cattle.Google Scholar
27.Nelson, M. C. and Seitz, W. D.. 1979. An economicanalysis of soil erosion control in a watershed representing Corn Belt conditions. North Central J. of Agric. Econ. 1(2):173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Oelhaf, R. C. 1978. Organic Agriculture: Economic and Ecological Comparisons with Conventional Methods. Allenheld, Osmun and Co., Montclair, NJ.Google Scholar
29.Penn State University. 1985–1986. Penn State Agronomy Guide. College of Agric. Ext. Ser., University Park, PA.Google Scholar
30.Phillips, S. H. 1978. No-tillage, past and present, pp. 1–5. In: Proceedings of the First Annual Southeastern No-Till Systems Conf. Special Publ. No. 5. College of Agric. Exp. Station, The Univ. of Georgia.Google Scholar
31.Pope, C. A., Bhide, S., and Heady, E. O.. 1983. Economics of conservation tillage in Iowa. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 38(4):370–373.Google Scholar
32.Shearer, G., Kohl, D. H., Wanner, D., Kuepper, G., Sweeney, S., and Lockeretz, W.. 1981. Crop production: Costs and returns on Midwestern organic farms: 1977 and 1978. pp. 264–269. Amer. J. Agric. Econ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Swanson, E. R. and Harshbarger, C. E.. 1964. An economic analysis of the effects of soil loss on crop yields. J. of Soil and Water Conserv. Sept–Oct:183–186.Google Scholar
34.Swanson, E. R. and Maccalum, D. E.. 1969. Income effects of rainfall erosion control. J. of Soil and Water Conserv. Mar–Apr:57–59.Google Scholar
35.Timmons, J. F. and Amos, O. M. Jr., 1982. Economics of soil erosion control with application to T values. American Society Agronomy Special Publ. No. 45, pp. 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic fanning. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
37.Vogtmann, J. 1984. Organic farming practices and research in Europe. In: Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture, Bezdicek, D. F. and Power, J. F. (eds.), pp. 37–48. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
38.Wegrzyn, V. A. 1984. Nitrogen fertility management in corn-A case study on a mixed crop-livestock farm in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania State Univ. Univ. Park, PA. (unpubl. Ph.D. Dissertation).Google Scholar
39.White, G. B. and Partenheimer, E. J.. 1979. Economic Implications of clean streams legislation for commercial dairy farms in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania State Univ., Agrie. Expt. Station, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
40.Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D.. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. USDA, Agricultural Handbook No. 537.Google Scholar