Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:30:43.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commission of Jurists to Consider and Report Upon the Revision of the Rules of Warfare, General Report.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Conference on the Limitation of Armament at Washington adopted at its sixth plenary session on the 4th February, 1922, a resolution for the appointment of a Commission representing the United States of America, the British Empire, France, Italy and Japan to consider the following questions:

(a) Do existing rules of international law adequately cover new methods of attack or defence resulting from the introduction or development, since The Hague Conference of 1907, of new agencies of warfare?

(b) If not so, what changes in the existing rules ought to be adopted in consequence thereof as a part of the law of nations?

Type
Official Documents
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 32 , Issue S1 , January 1938 , pp. 1 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers, Cmd. 2201. Misc. No. 14 (1924). The articles of this report, without the accompanying comment, were printed from a text made public by the Department of State, in this JOURNAL, Supp., Vol. 17 (1923), p. 242. The completetext is now published in view of later events and discussions of the subject.—ED.

References

* United States of America, Great Britain and The Netherlands.

* Acts of the personnel of correctly marked enemy aircraft, public or private, done or performed while in the air, are not to be deemed espionage.

* See Minute 105. [Not printed in this Supplement.—ED.]