No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Developments Related to the Military Commissions Act and Detentions at Guantánamo Bay
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007
References
1 President Bush Discusses American Competitiveness Initiative During Press Conference (Aug. 9, 2007), at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070809-l.html>; see Michael, Abramowitz, Cheney: Don’t Close Guantanamo Yet, Wash.Post, Aug. 7, 2007, at A4Google Scholar; William, Glaberson, Hurdles Frustrate Effort to Shrink Guantánamo, N.Y. Times, Aug. 9, 2007, at A1.Google Scholar
2 For information on the Court of Military Commission Review, including access to the pleadings and decisions in the case, see <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/courtofmilitarycommissionreview.html>.
3 John, R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 101 AJIL 659 (2007).Google Scholar
4 United States v. Khadr, No. CMCR 0 7–001, slip op. at 9 (U.S. Ct. Mil. Comm’n Rev. Sept. 24, 2007).
5 Id. at 1 1–15.
6 Id. at 2 0–25; see William, Glaberson, Military Says It Can Repair Guantánamo Trial Defects, N.Y. Times, Aug. 25, 2007, at A9Google Scholar; U.S. Urges Court to Let Detainee Trial Proceed, Wash.Post, Aug. 25, 2007, at A4; William, Glaberson, Court Eases Way to Try Detainees, N.Y. Times, Sept. 25, 2007, at A1Google Scholar; Josh, White, Court Reverses Ruling on Detainees, Wash. Post, Sept. 25, 2007, at A4.Google Scholar
7 Jeff, Zeleney, Democrats Hope to Expand Rights at Guantánamo, N.Y. Times, June 6, 2007, at A16Google Scholar; Josh, White, Senate Committee Approves Bill for Detainee Hearings, Wash. Post, June 8, 2007, at A3Google Scholar; Jonathan, Weisman, GOP Blocks Bid on Rights of Detainees, Wash. Post, Sept. 20, 2007, at A5.Google Scholar
8 Pub. L. No. 10 9–148, §1005(e)(2)(A), 119 Stat. 2739, 2742.
9 Id. §1005(e)(2)(C); see John, R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 100 AJIL 457 (2006).Google Scholar
10 William, Glaberson, Court Tells U.S. to Reveal Data on Guantánamo, N.Y. Times, July 21, 2007, at A1Google Scholar.
11 Bismullah v. Gates, No. 0 6–1197 (D.C. Cir. July 20, 2007), at <http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/BismullahDecision.pdf>.
12 Id. at 2–3.
13 Concurring op. at 3.
14 William, Glaberson, Security Chiefs Cite Danger in Revealing Detainee Data, N.Y. Times, Sept. 12, 2007, at A16Google Scholar; Carol, D. Leonnig, Intelligence Chiefs Back a Guantanamo Reversal, Wash. Post, Sept. 12, 2007, at A5.Google Scholar
15 Foreign and Commonwealth Office Press Release, Guantanamo Bay: Former UK Residents (Aug. 7, 2007), at <http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=Market/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1007029391638&a=KArticle&aid=1184760001011>.
16 Raymond, Bonner, Britain Asks to Take Back 5 Guantanamo Detainees, N.Y. Times, Aug. 8, 2007, at A3Google Scholar; Karla, Adam, Britain Asks U.S. to Free 5 Detainees, Wash. Post, Aug. 8, 2007, at A10.Google Scholar
17 U.S. Dep’t of Defense News Release No. 98 7–07, Detainee Transfer Announced (Aug. 9, 2007), at <http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11219>.
18 16at Guantánamo Are Transferred to Saudi Custody, N.Y.Times, Sept. 7, 2007, at A18.