No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
District Court Holds That Detainees Brought from Other Countries to Afghanistan Can Seek U.S. Habeas Review
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000165388/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000165388a.jpg)
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of International Law
References
1 Eric, Schmitt Two Prisons, Similar Issues for President , N.Y. Times, Jan. 27, 2009, at A1Google Scholar; Richard, A. Oppel Jr., U.S. Captain Hears Pleas of Afghan Detainee , N.Y. Times, May 25, 2009, at A1.Google Scholar
2 al Maqaleh v. Gates, 604 F.Supp.2d 205 (D.D.C. 2009); see Charlie, Savage Judge Rules Some Prisoners at Bagram Have Right of Habeas Corpus , N.Y. Times, Apr. 2, 2009, at A14.Google Scholar
3 128 S.Ct. 2229 (2008).
4 604 F.Supp.2d at 207.
5 Id. at 214 (citation omitted)
6 Id. at 208-09.
7 Obama to Appeal Detainee Ruling , N.Y. Times, Apr. 11, 2009, at A6.Google Scholar
8 [Editor’s Note: Executive Order 13,493: Review of Detention Policy Options, 74 Fed. Reg. 4901 (Jan. 22, 2009).]
9 A Reckoning at Bagram , Editorial, Wash. Post, Mar. 7, 2009, at A12Google Scholar; The Next Guantdnamo , Editorial, N.Y. Times, Apr. 13, 2009, at A18.Google Scholar