Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-17T02:23:50.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Re Lo Dolce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 1953 , pp. 150 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 15 Stat. 629, 1 Malloy’s Treaties 966. Although the court does not mention the fact, in Art. I of the treaty the parties agree to extradite persons convicted of or charged with the crimes specified, “committed within, the jurisdiction of one of the contracting parties.” [Italics supplied.]

2 61 Stat. 1245, T.I.A.S., No. 1648, this Journal, Supp., Vol. 42 (1948), p. 47. Art. 44 provides that each Allied or Associated Power will notify Italy “which of its prewar bilateral treaties with Italy it desires to keep in force or revive.”

3 See also Be Government of India and Mubarik Ali Ahmed, [1952] 1 All Eng. L. R. 1060 (Q.B. Apr. 4, 1952), on extradition from England to India of a Pakistan national under the British statutes, kept in force despite India’s becoming a republic within the Commonwealth.