Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:34:10.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inapplicability of OAS Report to Death Penalty Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 880 - 881
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See United States v. Flores, 63 F.3d 1342 (5th Cir. 1995).

2 United States v. Garza, 165 F.3d 312 (5th Cir. 1999).

3 May 2, 1948, OAS Res. XXX, International Conference of American States, 9th Conf., OAS Doc. OEA/Ser. L/V/I.4 Rev. II (1948), reprinted in Burns, H. Weston, 3 International Law and World Order: Basic Documents, at III.B.23 (1994)Google Scholar.

4 Case 12.243, Inter-Am. C.H.R., paras. 92–95 (Apr. 4, 2001), at <http://www.cidh.org/annualrep/2000eng/chapterIII/merits/usal2.243.htm>.

5 Id., para. 92.

6 Id., para. 105

7 Id., paras. 110–11.

8 Id., para. 120.

9 [Editor’s Note: American Convention on Human Rights, opened for signature Nov. 22, 1969, 1144 UNTS 123.]

10 Garza v. Lappin, 253 F.3d 918, 924–25 (7th Cir. 2001).