Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:31:15.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interference with American Mails

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Department of State Bulletin, Vol. II, No. 28, Jan. 6, 1940.

2 See Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences, Scott, J. B., ed. (New York, 1920), Vol. III, p. 1106 Google Scholar, where, in reply to a question, it was said that “postal packages are certainly excluded from the privileged treatment accorded postal correspondence.” See also, Report to the Secretary of State of the Delegates of the United States to the Second Hague Conference, Foreign Relations, 1907, Pt. II, p. 1163.

3 Papers Relating to Foreign Affairs, Diplomatic Correspondence (1863), Washington, 1864, Vol. I, p. 398 Google Scholar.

4 Mr. Seward to Mr. Welles, ibid., p. 402.

5 Scott, J. B., The Hague Court Reports (New York, 1916), p. 335 Google Scholar.

6 Savage, C., Policy of the United States toward Maritime Commerce in War, Department of State Publication No. 835 (Washington, 1936), Vol. II, pp. 433, 498–504Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., p. 505.

8 Ibid., p. 529.

9 Department of State Bulletin, Vol. II, No. 31, Jan. 27, 1940.

10 Savage, , op. cit., II, p. 595 Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., p. 528.

12 Savage, , op. cit., II, pp. 530531 Google Scholar.