No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interhandel Case (Switzerland v. United States of America). Request by the Swiss Government for the Indication of Interim Measures of Protection. I.C.J. Reports, 1957, p. 105
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 June 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000187020/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000187020a.jpg)
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1958
References
1 Vice President Badawi, Acting President; President Hackworth; Judges Guerrero, Basdevant, Winiarski, Zoričić, Klaestad, Head, Armand-Ugon, Kojevnikov, Sir Muhammad Zafrulla Khan, Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, Moreno Quintana, Córdova, Wellington Koo; M. Paul Carry, Judge ad hoc.
2 Judge Klaestad in his separate opinion took the position that, prima facie, the American objection was valid, but that this finding is itself provisional. No party having challenged the validity of the American reservation, it will be given effect.
3 Judge Lauterpacht's concurring opinion stated, inter alia, that the American objection destroyed any prima facie jurisdiction and that, therefore, the Court had no power under Article 41.