Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:28:12.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Human Rights. Universalism Versus Relativism. By Alison Dundes Renteln. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1990. Pp. 205. Index. $35, cloth; $16.95, paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Douglas L. Donoho*
Affiliation:
Nova University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Throughout the book Renteln suggests that the words, deeds and values of national representatives or “elites” of “third world” nations may not, for purposes of human rights, accurately represent the values of their national constituencies. See, e.g., pp. 38, 54, 89 and 92. Whether this assertion is true or not, Renteln fails to provide any empirical support whatsoever for her supposition or explain why this alleged discrepancy is not equally true for western industrialized countries (whose representatives are similarly composed of social “elites”). Nor does Renteln explain who might be sufficiently populist to reflect “people’s” values “accurately.”

2 Quoting Schmidt, Some Criticisms of Cultural Relativism, 70 J. Phil. 780, 782 (1955).

3 Enculturation is the process by which people unconsciously acquire the moral values of their own culture and accept them as universal truths.

4 See, e.g., R. Howard, Human Rights in Commonwealth Africa 16–29 (1987).