Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T07:11:52.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Major Middle Eastern Problems in International Law. Majid Khadduri (ed.). Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1972. pp. 139. Index. $4.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Eugene V. Rostow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , October 1973 , pp. 808 - 810
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lord Geohge-Bhown, In My Way 226–27 (1971, Penguin ed., 1972); Rostow, , Legal Aspects of the Search for Peace in the Middle East , [1970] Proc. ASIL, 64 AJIL (no. 4) 64 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Statement by the Rt. Hon. Michael Stewart, H. C. (5th ser.), 791 Parl. Deb. 844–45 and 793 Parl. Deb. 253, 261 (1969); Lall, , The United Nations and the Middle East Crisis, 1967, at 252–66 (1968)Google Scholar; Blum, , Secure Boundaries and Middle East Peace 71–79 (1971)Google Scholar.

2 On p. 42, Mr. Van Dusen misstates the burden of a General Assembly Resolution of July 4, 1967. It did not declare the administrative unification of Jerusalem invalid, but declared against measures which might “change the Status of the City.” GA Res. 2253, July 4, 1967. The same theme dominates GA RES. 2254, July 14, 1967.

3 In a letter to the Secretary-General by Foreign Minister Eban, the Israeli Government said “[t]he resolution presented on July 4 by Pakistan and adopted on the same date evidently refers to measures taken by the Government of Israel on 27 July 1967. The term ‘annexation’ used by supporters of the resolution is out of place. The measures adopted relate to the integration of Jerusalem in the administrative and municipal spheres, and furnish a legal basis for the protection of the Holy Places in Jerusalem.” Official Records Security Council, Suppl. for July, Aug. and Sept., 1967, at 75. See also Official Records General Assembly, 1554th Plen. Meeting, July 14, 1967, paras. 74–78.