Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T16:39:42.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Military Tribunals and their Jurisdiction1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Extract

The early Romans had their præfecti prætorio, or military judges, afterwards replaced by magistri militum, who exercised a jurisdiction somewhat corresponding to modern courts-martial and military commissions. It is true that there has been much dispute in regard to the exact limits of this jurisdiction, as conferred by the laws which have been handed down to us, yet its general outlines have been pretty well agreed upon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The foregoing was found among the papers of General Halleck at his death, which occurred at Louisville, Kentucky, on January 9, 1872. The article is in the general’s handwriting and was prepared probably in the latter part of the year 1864, its preparation having been suggested by the number of wrongful acts committed in the Northern States, at a considerable distance from the theatre of war, by persons having no direct connection with the military service. Although these acts had not been given the character of criminal offenses by acts of Congressional legislation, they were none the less subversive of public order and in the highest injurious to public safety.

The paper has value as expressing the views of one of the ablest and most experienced lawyers in the service of the Government in respect to the embarrassing conditions which confronted the administration of President Lincoln during the latter part of the year 1864.

References

1 The foregoing was found among the papers of General Halleck at his death, which occurred at Louisville, Kentucky, on January 9, 1872. The article is in the general’s handwriting and was prepared probably in the latter part of the year 1864, its preparation having been suggested by the number of wrongful acts committed in the Northern States, at a considerable distance from the theatre of war, by persons having no direct connection with the military service. Although these acts had not been given the character of criminal offenses by acts of Congressional legislation, they were none the less subversive of public order and in the highest injurious to public safety.

The paper has value as expressing the views of one of the ablest and most experienced lawyers in the service of the Government in respect to the embarrassing conditions which confronted the administration of President Lincoln during the latter part of the year 1864.