Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T11:16:40.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Recognition in the Courts: The Ships of the Baltic Republics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Extract

Non-recognition by the United States Government of the absorption of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1940 has confronted our courts with a series of questions reminiscent of the period of our non-recognition of the Soviet Government.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Kotkas. Silberberg v. The Kotkas et al. 35 F. Supp. 983 (1940).

2 The Regent. Latvijas Kugniecibas Sabiedriba v. The Regent et al. 35 F. Supp. 985 (1940). Because the parties subsequently reached an agreement for the operation of the vessel, the court reopened the case to permit the appointment of Joseph G. Kearns and Charles Recht as joint trustees to operate the vessel, and of Daniel F. Young, Inc., as operating agent of the trustees, all such persons having been chosen by the parties. “On August 8, 1942, a petition was filed on behalf of Alfred Bilmanis, as Minister Plenipotentiary, Envoy Extraordinary, and Consul General of Latvia in the United States, by his attorney, which petition recites that it was made under the authority of the treaty between the United States and the Republic of Latvia; that the Regent was owned by one Jaris Freimanis, a Latvian national and resident of Riga, Latvia; that on or about June 17, 1940, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics seized the Republic of Latvia, and that since said date the people thereof have not had a free choice in the making of decisions respecting their property; that on June 22, 1941, the armed forces of the German Reich entered the Republic of Latvia and by force of arms expelled the semblance of government which had wrongfully been set tip in the Republic of Latvia by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It is further recited that at the present time the Republic of Latvia and its people are free from the mandates and duress of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, but are coerced under the duress of the armed forces and officials of the German Reich; that Latvia is recognized by the United States of America as an existing, independent, political entity; that the United States does not recognize the Soviet invasion and forceful annexation of Latvia, and did not sanction the attempt to include it in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and that the United States Government still does not recognize the absorption of Latvia nor the legality of the so-called naturalization [nationalization] acts or decrees affecting property in the Republic of Latvia.” Since the Regent had been torpedoed and Freimanis had died, petitioner asked for the dismissal of the libel, the termination of the trusteeship of Recht and others, and the payment of freight earned and insurance collected to the administrator of the estate of Freimanis. The petition was denied by Judge Galston on November 6, 1942, in part because petitioner had failed to dispel a previous admission by his counsel that Freimanis was not a Latvian national but was a naturalized German citizen. The trustees were instructed to hold the trust fund subject to the orders of the court. Cf., The Regent, 47 F. Supp. 995 (1942), from which the above quotation is made.

3 All Union Chartering Company (Sovfracht) v. S. S. Kotkas (renamed Farida) and Ernest Kallas. 1941 American Maritime Cases 555. U. S. District Court, E. D., N. Y. (1941).

4 A/S Merilaid and Company v. S. S. Kuressaar, also known as S. S. Merida, and August Tarius. 1941 A.M.C. 1190 (1941).

5 The Signe. Tiedemann v. The Signe et al. 37 F. Supp. 819 (1941).

6 Cf. U. S. Executive Agreement Series No. 83.

7 The Signe (renamed Florida). 39 F. Supp. 810 (U. S. D. C, E. D., La., 1941).

8 The court discharged a trustee hitherto appointed by it and ordered him to surrender the vessel to Estoduras. Cf. Oskar Tiedemann et al. v. S. S. Signe (renamed Florida) and Estoduras Steamship Co., Inc., 1941 A. M. C. 1008 (U. S. D. C, E. D., La., Jan. 2, 1941), where earlier events are summarized.

9 The Florida. Tiedemann et al. v. Estoduras Steamship Company, Inc., 133 F. 2d 719 (C. C. A., 5th, 1943). Certiorari denied, 63 Sup. Ct. 1439 (1943).

10 S. S. Denny. 40 F. Supp. 92 (U. S. D. C, N. J., July 22, 1941).

11 This phrase is taken from the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, 127 F. 2d 404, 408n.

12 The Denny. Agricultural Coöperative Ass’n. of Lithuania Lietukis et al. v. The Denny et al. (Latvian State Cargo & Passenger S. S. Line, Intervener.) 127 F. 2d 404 (C. C. A., 3rd, March 27, 1942.) Rehearing denied April 21, 1942.

13 The court found that the authority of Charles Recht to act for intervener State Steamship Line had not been established.