Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:12:23.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“ Political Offence ” in Extradition Treaties Between the United States and Other Countries.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

See editorial comment, p. 459.

References

2 There is a similar provision in the treaty with Baden, Mutual surrender of criminals, January 30, 1857, article 1.

3 Similar provisions exist in treaties with: Denmark, Extradition of fugitives from justice, January 6, 1902, article 6; Peru, Extradition of criminals, November 28, 1899, article 6; Servia, Mutual extradition of fugitives from justice, October 25, 1901, article 6; Sweden, Extradition of criminals, January 14, 1893, article 6; Panama, Mutual extradition of criminals, May 25, 1904, article 6.

4 Similar provisions exist in treaties with: Chile, Extradition of criminals, April 17, 1900, article 6; Great Britain, Extradition convention, July 12, 1889, article 2.

5 A similar provision exists in the treaty with Cuba, Mutual extradition of fugitives from justice, April 6, 1904, article 6.

6 A similar provision exists in the treaty with Luxemburg, Extradition of criminals, October 29, 1883, article 4.