Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:25:54.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Propos of a “Reno Divorce” and its Validity in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 542 note 1 Lien on the property of the losing party, imposed as a result of the court’s decision.

page 542 note 2 Supreme Court of France, 1-5-1943, Sirey, 43-1-59; 2-25-1947, Dalloz, 47-161.

page 543 note 3 Niboyet, Manuel de Droit International Privé (2nd ed.), p. 699, and footnote 2.

page 543 note 4 Supreme Court of France, 11-11-1908, Dalloz, 14-1-118 ; 2-21-1933, Gazette du Palais, 33-1-745; Civil Court of Paris, 5-11-1933, Gazette du Palais, 33-2-202.

page 543 note 5 Valéry, Manuel de Droit International Privé, No. 594, p. 838 ; Lapradelle and Niboyet, Répertoire de Droit International, Vol. 5, Vo. “Divorce et Séparation de Corps” No. 132; Civil Court of Paris 6-10-1936, Gazette du Palais, 36-2-753.

page 543 note 6 W. v. W. . . ., Court of Appeals of Paris, 1st Chamber, Dec. 15, 1948.

page 544 note 7 Répertoire Pratique Dallos, Vo. “Action,” No. 39 et seq.; Dalloz, Nouveau Répertoire, Vo. “Action,” Nos. 3 and 7.