Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T06:27:06.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 417 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The court also rejected appellants’ argument that the case should be dismissed on grounds of forum non conveniens.

2 806 F.2d 344, 354.

3 Id.

4 Id. at 356.

5 Id. at 359.

6 See Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres, S.A., 163 F.2d 246 (2d Cir.), cert, denied 332 U.S. 772 (1947); Banco de Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 114 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1940).

7 376 U.S. 398 (1964).

8 Id. at 428.

9 806 F.2d at 360.

10 Id.