Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:21:17.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Second Circuit Affirms Orders Requiring Argentina to Treat Restructured and Holdout Bondholders Equally; Argentina Seeks Certiorari in Related Extraterritorial Discovery Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 727 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2013); see Tom Hamburger & Carol D. Leonnig, U.S. Ponders Position in Argentine Debt Suit, Wash. Post, July 13, 2013, at A4; Peter Eavis, Hedge Funds Win Ruling in Argentina Bond Case, N.Y. Times, Aug. 24, 2013, at B1.

2 Floyd Norris, Not Crying for Argentina but Fearful of a Ruling, N.Y. Times, Aug. 30, 2013, at B1.

3 NML Capital, 727 F.3d at 737.

4 [Editor’s note: see Peter Eavis, Banks Fear Court Ruling in Argentina Bond Debt, N.Y. Times, Feb. 26, 2013, at B 1; Emily Schmall, Argentina: U.S. Court Orders Debt Repayment Plan, N.Y. Times, Mar. 2, 2013, at A5.]

5 NML Capital, 727 F.3d at 240–41.

6 Id. at 247–48.

7 EM Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 695 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2012); see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 107 AJIL 207, 219 (2013)Google Scholar.

8 Petition for Writ of Certiorari at i, Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., No. 12-842 (U.S. Jan. 2013), available at http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Final-Petition.pdf

9 Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 133 S. Ct. 1855 (Apr. 15, 2013) (inviting solicitor general’s brief in Case No. 12-842).