Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T21:24:00.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Settlement of the Interhandel Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

H. G.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 97 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Civil Action No. 4360-48.

2 46 A.J.I.L. 554 (1952).

3 51 ibid. 818 (1957).

4 53 ibid. 177 (1959).

5 Ibid. 671; Briggs, “Interhandel: The Court's Judgment of March 21, 1959, on the Preliminary Objections of the United States,” ibid. 547.

6 Domke, “ The War Claims Act of 1962,” 57 ibid. 354, 367-368 (1963).

7 The text of the Order and Stipulation of Settlement as amended is reproduced at 3 Int. Legal Materials 426 (1964).

8 The 11% of the General Aniline shares not claimed by Interhandel are excluded from the agreement and will presumably also be sold by the Government.