No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Solicitor General’s Brief in Bond v. United States Defends Missouri v. Holland
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000013294/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000013294a.jpg)
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2013
References
8 See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 271, 278 (2010)Google Scholar; 105 AJIL 775, 782 (2011); 107 AJIL 431,432 (2013).
9 Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920).
10 See Ronald J. Bettauer, Supreme Court May Consider How Broadly the “Necessary and Proper” Clause of the Constitution Authorizes Legislation to Implement Treaties, ASIL Insights (Mar. 11, 2013), at http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/17/issue/9/supreme-court-may-consider-how-broadly-%E2%80%9Cnecessary-and-proper%E2%80%9D-clause.
11 Brief for the United States at 8–10, Bond v. United States, No. 12-158 (U.S. Aug. 2013), available at http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-158_resp.authcheckdam.pdf.