No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Supreme Court Interprets the Liquor Treaties
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000051514/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000051514a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1927
References
1 Decision rendered April 11,1927. For discussion of the liquor treaties, see this J ou rn a l , Vol. 20, pp. I ll, 340, 444, and Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparee, 3d series, Vol. 7, p. 371.
2 47 S. Ct. 531; 71 L. Ed. 610.
3 3 F. (2d) 643.
4 10 F. (2d) 339.
5 Article II is practically identical, mutatia mutandis, in all the liquor conventions which have been concluded to date. See this J ou rn a l , Vol. 20, p. 340; U. S. Treaty Series, No.738 and No. 749.
6 43 U. S. Stat. at L. 1761.
7 47 S. Ct. 531, 536, 537; 71 L. Ed. 610, 616, 617.
8 47 S. Ct. 531, 539; 71 L. Ed. 610, 619.
9 221 U. S. 280, 285.
10 47 S. Ct. 531, 541; 71 L. Ed. 610, 621.