Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T19:14:44.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supreme Court Interprets the Liquor Treaties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edwin D. Dickinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , July 1927 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Decision rendered April 11,1927. For discussion of the liquor treaties, see this J ou rn a l , Vol. 20, pp. I ll, 340, 444, and Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparee, 3d series, Vol. 7, p. 371.

2 47 S. Ct. 531; 71 L. Ed. 610.

3 3 F. (2d) 643.

4 10 F. (2d) 339.

5 Article II is practically identical, mutatia mutandis, in all the liquor conventions which have been concluded to date. See this J ou rn a l , Vol. 20, p. 340; U. S. Treaty Series, No.738 and No. 749.

6 43 U. S. Stat. at L. 1761.

7 47 S. Ct. 531, 536, 537; 71 L. Ed. 610, 616, 617.

8 47 S. Ct. 531, 539; 71 L. Ed. 610, 619.

9 221 U. S. 280, 285.

10 47 S. Ct. 531, 541; 71 L. Ed. 610, 621.