No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Treaties—effect of war and Versailles Treaty provisions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000039580/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000039580a.jpg)
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1952
References
1 The court cited Clark v. Allen, 331 U. S. 503 (1947), this Journal, Vol. 42 (1948), p. 201; Techt v. Hughes, 229 N. Y. 222, 128 N. E. 185 (1920); State ex rel. Miner v. Reardon, 120 Kan. 614, 245 Pac. 158 (1926); Goos v. Brocks, 117 Neb. 750, 223 N. W. 13 (1929); and The Sophie Rickmers, 45 P. (2d) 413 (S. D. N. Y. 1930).
2 Citing Hackworth, Digest of International Law, Vol. 5, pp. 387–390 (1943); the court did not, however, allude to the fact that Hackworth reports the Department of State as having written in 1923 that a treaty which was not notified under Article 289 was considered to be no longer in force, ibid., pp. 388–389.
3 Citing State ex rel. Miner v. Reardon, 120 Kan. 614, 245 Pac. 158 (1926).