Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T18:05:34.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Turkish Straits in the Light of Recent Turkish-Soviet Russian Correspondence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Cemil Bilsel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It will be remembered that notes were exchanged between the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Kussia, and the Republic of Turkey on the subject of the Turkish Straits which it was desired during the Potsdam talks to link with the general problem of peace. It is our intention to discuss the problem of the Straits in the light of these notes.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 1947 , pp. 727 - 747
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pp. 339-343.

2 Vol. I, p. 506.

3 La Turquie, in La Vie Juridique des Peuples, pp. 342-385.

4 This Journal, Vol. 38 (1944), p. 546.

5 In the course of the scholastic year 1946-1947 Professor Herbert Smith (London University), Professor Phillip Jessup (Columbia University), Professor Herbert Briggs (Cornell University) and Professor Gilbert Gidel (former Rector of the University of Paris) were so invited. Professor Smith arrived in October, 1946 and lectured on The Changing Law of Nations. Professor Briggs lectured in Turkey in March of this year. I should like to express our gratitude to United States Ambassador Wilson who is greatly admired by all concerned and to whom we are indebted for his kindness in ensuring the visit of the American professor.

6 Actes de la Conférence de Montreux concernant le Bégime des Détroits, p. 181.

7 S. Gorianow, Le Bosphore et les Dardanelles, 1907.

8 Paris, 1910; for Benouvin’s opinion see Revue de Droit International, T. V., p. 568.

9 Actes de la Conférence de Montreux, p. 23.

10 This Journal, Vol. 37 (1943), p. 640.

11 N. Dascoviçi, La Question au Bosphore, 1915.

12 Traité de Oroit International, Vol. 2, p. 357.

13 Traité de Droit International, Vol. 2, pp. 356-358.

14 Traité de Droit International, Vol. I, p. 507.

15 Same, Vol. II, pp. 357-368.