No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
United Kingdom Case Note
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000102209/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000102209a.jpg)
Keywords
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968
References
1 1967] 2 All E.E. 200
2 [1967] 2 All E.E. 1238 at 1242.
3 Ibid. at 1243. Following Walker v. Baird, [1892] A.C. 491; and Johnstone v. Pedlar, [1921] 2 A.C. 262.
4 British South Africa Co. v. Companhia de Mocambique, [1893] A.C. 602.
5 E.g., A.-G. v. De Keyser's Boyal Hotel, Ltd., [1920] A.C. 508; Burmah Oil Company v. Lord Advocate, [1965] A.C. 75.
6 [1967] 2 AH E.B. 1238 at 1244.
7 Ibid. This was also the view of Stephenson below.
8 Edited by Philip J. Fetner, LL.B.