Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T23:16:10.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

War and Responsibility. Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath. By John Hart Ely. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. Pp. x, 238. Index. $24.95; £21.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Sean D. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (1980).

2 Id. at 87.

3 Here Ely cites Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 610 (1952) (Frankfurter, J., concurring).

4 By contrast, Ely finds that the “secret war” in Laos (1962–1969), and the secret bombing of Cambodia (1969–1970)—both of which were largely unrelated to U.S. actions taken in Vietnam—were not known about or authorized by Congress, and hence were unconstitutional. The proper course when such wars become known, in Ely’s view, is either impeachment of the President or, at a minimum, a congressional resolution of censure.

5 Curiously, Ely notes an amicus brief filed in Dellums v. Bush, 752 F.Supp. 1141 (D.D.C. 1990), by “eleven law professors” without disclosing his personal involvement.