Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T16:15:54.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The World Court Reference Guide: Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice (1922-2000). By Bimal Patel. The Hague, London, New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002. Pp. 928. Index. $175.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

John R. Crook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , July 2003 , pp. 734 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Mosk, Richard M., The Pace of the Proceedings, in The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Process of International Claims Resolution 201, 206–07 (Caron, David & Crook, John eds., 2000)Google Scholar.

2 S.S. Wimbledon (U.K., Fr., Italy, Japan v. Ger.), 1923 PCIJ (ser. A) No. 1 (Aug. 17).

3 Factory at Chorzow (Ger. v. Pol.), 1928 PCIJ (ser. A) No. 17 (Sept. 13).

4 Id.

5 Judge Hudson records that Germany and Poland deposited the funds required to underwrite the experts’ work, and the remaining balances were refunded after the work was completed. Manley O. Hudson, The Permanent Court of International Justice, 1920–1942 428, n. 7 (1934). However, the substance of the experts’ report is not reported in any source currently available to the reviewer.

6 Appeal from a Judgment of the Hungaro-Czechoslovak Mixed Arbitral Tribunal (Peter Pazmany Univ. v. Czechoslovakia) (Czech, v. Hung.), 1933 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 61 (Dec. 15).

7 Competence of the International Labour Organization, Advisory Opinion, 1926 PCIJ (ser. B) No. 13 (July 26).

8 Interpretation of the Convention of 1919 Concerning Employment of Women During the Night, Advisory Opinion, 1932 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 50 (Nov. 15).

9 Phosphates in Morocco (Italy v. Fr.), 1938 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 74, at 10 (June 14).

10 Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belg. v. Spain), 1970 ICJ REP. 3 (Feb. 5).

11 Admission of a State to the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, 1948 ICJ REP. 57 (May 28).

12 Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion, 1951 ICJ Rep. 15 (May 28).

13 Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 Between the WHO and Egypt, Advisory Opinion, 1980 ICJ Rep. 73 (Dec. 20).

14 South West Africa cases (Eth. v. S. Afr.; Liber, v. S. Afr.), 1966 ICJ Rep. 6 (July 18).

15 United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (U.S. v. Iran), 1980 ICJ REP. 3 (May 24).

16 Fisheries case (UKv. Norway), 1951 ICJ Rep. 116 (Dec. 18).

17 Oscar Chinn case (Belg./UK), 1934 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 63, at 65 (Dec. 12).

18 Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Belg. v. Bulg.), 1939 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 77, at 64 (Apr. 4).

19 1155 UNTS 331, 8 ILM 679 (1969).