Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T22:09:08.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Codification of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Philip Marshall Brown
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One who was present during a discussion at Paris by President Wilson, Lloyd George, and Clemenceau concerning the subject of Mandates has stated that it was quite evident each was employing this novel term in a different sense. So it is with the term codification: like the Monroe Doctrine, whether you are in favor of it or opposed to it, codification is variously understood and interpreted. The discussions of the subject in the League of Nations in recent years indicate a serious divergence of opinion, although everybody would seem to favor some form of codification.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1935 , pp. 25 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Procès-Verbauxof the Proceedings of the Committee, The Hague, 1920, pp. 747-748.

2 British Year Book of International Law, 1932, p.7.

3 Quoted by Manley O.Hudson in an editorial on “The Prospect for Future Codification” in this Journal, Vol. 26 (1932), p. 137.

4 British Year Book of International Law, 1924, pp. 41-44.

5 This Journal, Vol. 16 (1922), p. 423.

6 The Growth of the Law, p. 132.

7 Oppenheim's International Law, 4th ed., Vol.I, pp. 49-51.

8 Le Droit International Codifié,p.6.

9 Id.,p.17.

10 International Law, p.11.

11 International Law, 8th ed., p.12.