Article contents
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000212360/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000212360a.jpg)
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982
References
1 The suggested amendments were intended (1) to clarify the authority of customs authorities to seize an item already admitted upon the basis of apparently satisfactory evidence, should it later be ascertained that the item would not have been admitted, had the correct facts been known; and (2) to require a setting out of “facts,” rather than “belief,” as a basis for certain required statements.
2 Dept. of State File No. P82 0042–2194.
1 18 Weekly Comp. of Pres. Doc. 349–50 (March 29, 1982), 128 Cong. Rec. S2513 (daily ed. March 22, 1982). See also 76 AJIL 181 (1982).
- 1
- Cited by