Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T01:01:48.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Effects” Doctrine of Jurisdiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Stanley D. Metzger
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 1015 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1967

References

1 61 A.J.LL. 558 (1967).

2 United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F. 2d 416, 443 (2d Cir., 1945).

3 61 A.J.I.L. at 568-569 (1967).

4 See also Bishop, International Law: Cases and Materials 464 (2d ed., 1962), where he quotes a long-standing New York penal statute stating that “A person who commits an act without this state which affects persons or property within this state, or the public health, morals, or decency of this state, and which, if committed within this state, would be a crime, is punishable as if the act were committed within this state.“

5 Fugate, Foreign Commerce and the Antitrust Laws 12-13 (1958).