Article contents
International Law and Totalitarian War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000136279/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000136279a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1941
References
1 Naval War College, International Law Discussions, 1903, pp. 115, 138.
2 E.g., Art. 552 of the French Civil Code, Art. 905 of the German Civil Code of 1896, Art. 207 of the Japanese Civil Code, Art. 2552 of the Argentine Civil Code of 1871.
3 See Thurston, “Trespass to Air Space,” Harvard Legal Essays, 1934, p. 501; Hackley, “Trespassers in the Sky,” 31 Minnesota Law Review (1937), p. 773.
4 Cf. Pickering v. Rudd (Kings Bench 1815), 4 Camp. 219, 16 Revised Reports 777; and Catoire c. Foulon et Gislain (1880) III, Dalloz 103; Butler v. Frontier Tel. Co., 186 N. Y. 486 (1906), and Delahaye c. Société” Généale des Industries Electriques (1900), II Dalloz 361.
5 Hinman v. Pacific Air Transport, 84 F. (2d) 755.
6 Cf. the discussions of the Institut de Droit International in the Annuaire, 1902, 1906, 1910 and 1911; but see the Reports of the International Law Association for 1912,1913 and 1920.
7 Cf. Royse, Aerial Bombardment (1928), p. 2.
8 Armour, “Customs of Warfare in Ancient India,” 8 Transactions of the Grotius Society (1923), p. 72.
- 1
- Cited by