Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T07:26:47.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richards v. Secretary of State. 752 F.2d 1413

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The declaration read as follows:

I hereby renounce all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign sovereign or state of whom or which I may at this time be a subject or citizen. I swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen so help me God.

752 F.2d 1413, 1416.

2 444 U.S. 252, reh’g denied, 445 U.S. 920 (1980).

3 18 U.S.C. §1481(c) provides in part:

[A]ny person who commits or performs, or who has committed or performed, any act of expatriation under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act shall be presumed to have done so voluntarily, but such presumption may be rebutted upon a showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the act or acts committed or performed were not done voluntarily.

4 The court relied on Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253, 268 (1967), which held that a U.S. citizen possesses “a constitutional right to remain a citizen . . . unless he voluntarily relinquishes that citizenship.” 752 F.2d at 1418.

5 See, e.g., United States v. Matheson, 400 F.Supp. 1241, 1245 (S.D.N.Y. 1975), aff’d, 532 F.2d 809 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 823 (1976); Terrazas v. Haig, 653 F.2d 285, 288 (7th Cir. 1981).