Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:12:51.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zenith Radio Corp. V. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. 494 F.Suppp. 1263

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 379 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 4 UST 2063, TIAS No. 2863, 206 UNTS 143.

2 Article XVI(l) of the Treaty provides: “Products of either Party shall be accorded, within the territories of the other Party, national treatment … in all matters affecting internal taxation, sale, distribution, storage and use.” Article XXII(l) defines national treatment: “The term ‘national treatment’ means treatment accorded within the territories of a Party upon terms no less favorable than the treatment accorded therein, in like situations, to nationals, companies, products, vessels or other objects, as the case may be, of such Party.“

3 E.g., In re Fotochrome, Inc., 377 F.Supp. 26, 29 (S.D.N.Y. 1974), aff'd sub nam. Fotochrome, Inc. v. Copal Co., Ltd., 517 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1975).

4 494 F.Supp. 1263, 1266.

5 Id. at 1266-67. PageNo:176