No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Select Recent Court Decisions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Other
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2004
References
1 296 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D. Mass. 2003) [hereinafter UMass Medical].
2 42 U.S.C. § 1395(ii) (2000).
3 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 24.
4 42 U.S.C. § 405(h).
5 Id. § 405(h).
6 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 24.
7 Id. at 25.
8 422 U.S. 749, 757-58 (1975).
9 Id.
10 81 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1049 (D. Idaho 1999).
11 Id. The court noted that although Idaho Falls interpreted section 405(h) to bar consideration of the defendant's rather than the plaintiff's claim, “it applied the provision in the same context as presented here.” UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 25.
12 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 26.
13 Id. at 27.
14 Id. at 28.
15 Id.
16 Id.
1 No. 2002-271, 2004 WL 226055 (Vt. Feb. 6, 2004).
2 Id. at ¶ 14. \
3 Id. at ¶ 8.
4 Id.
5 Id.
6 Id. at ¶ 11 (citing VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 8, §§ 4089a(b)(4)-(5) (1989)).
7 Id. at ¶ 12 (citing VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 8, § 4089a(c) (1989)).
8 Id. (citing VT. CODE R. 95-2, §§ 7B(1), (6) (2000)).
9 Id. at ¶ 13.
10 Id. at ¶ 14.
11 Id.
12 Id. at ¶ 14.
13 Id. at ¶ 23.