Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T15:11:15.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A response to Allen Buchanan's views on decision making for terminally ill incompetents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 1979

References

1 Buchanan, Medical Paternalism or Legal Imperialism: Not the Only Alternatives in Saikewicz type Cases, 5 Am. J. L. & Med. 97 (1979)Google ScholarPubMed.

2 Relman, The Saikewicz Decision: A Medical Viewpoint, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 233 (1978)Google Scholar.

3 Relman, The Saikewicz Decision: Judges as Physicians, 298 New England J. Med. 508 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Baron, Medical Paternalism and the Rule of Law: A Reply to Dr. Relman, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 337 (1979)Google Scholar.

5 Relman, supra note 2, at 236, 237, 242.

6 Relman, supra note 3.

7 Buchanan, supra note 1, at 10.

8 Id.

9 Annas, Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: Decision Making for the Terminally Ill Incompetent, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 367 (1979)Google Scholar.

10 Jackson, & Youngner, Patient Autonomy and “Death with Dignity“: Some Clinical Caveats, 301 New England J. Med. 404 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Cassell, Making and Escaping Moral Decisions, 1 Hastings Center Studies 53 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Jackson & Youngner, supra note 10.

13 Relman, supra note 2, at 242.

14 Relman, Michigan's Sensible Living Will, 300 New England J. Med. 1270 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Id.