Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:16:23.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucratic Politics in Radical Military Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Gregory J. Kasza
Gregory J. Kasza*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most theories of bureaucratic politics depict state bureaucracies as a conservative force in the political system. Their resistance to radical politics and innovative programs is attributed to certain typical traits of bureaucratic structures and career patterns. I summarize the arguments for bureaucratic conservatism, and then describe how civilian bureaucracies serving military regimes in Japan (1937–45), Peru (1968–75), and Egypt (1952–70) invalidated those arguments by promoting radical policy programs through the three devices of supraministerial bodies, low-ranking ministries, and new specialized agencies. I conclude that middle theories of bureaucratic politics may prove more fruitful than grand theoretical attempts to encompass all bureaucracies in a single set of propositions, and that structural and occupational explanations of bureaucratic behavior need to be modified by a greater appreciation for the role of individual bureaucratic leaders.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 851 - 872
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Malek, Anouar. 1968. Egypt: Military Society. Trans. Markmann, Charles Lam. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ayubi, Nazih N. M. 1980. Bureaucracy and Politics in Contemporary Egypt. London: Ithaca.Google Scholar
Baker, Raymond William. 1978. Egypt's Uncertain Revolution under Nasser and Sadat. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Leonard. 1966. Political Recruitment and Participation in Egypt. In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caiden, Gerald E. 1971. The Dynamics of Public Administration: Guidelines to Current Transformations in Theory and Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Cleaves, Peter S., and Scurrah, Martin J. 1980. Agriculture, Bureaucracy, and Military Government in Peru. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1976. Squatters and Oligarchs: Authoritarian Rule and Policy Change in Peru. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dekmejian, R. Hrair. 1971. Egypt under Nasir: A Study in Political Dynamics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Delgado Olivera, Carlos. 1973. Testimonio de lucha [Testimony of struggle]. Lima: Ediciones PEISA.Google Scholar
Dietz, Henry A. 1980. Poverty and Problem-Solving under Military Rule: The Urban Poor in Lima, Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Djilas, Milovan. 1957. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei. 1975. Introduction to The Mandarins of Western Europe, ed. Dogan, Mattei. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Einaudi, Luigi. 1976. Revolution from Within? Military Rule in Peru Since 1968. In Peruvian Nationalism: A Corporatist Revolution, ed. Chaplin, David. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Esman, Milton J. 1966. The Politics of Development Administration. In Approaches to Development: Politics, Administration, and Change, ed. Montgomery, John D. and Siffin, William J. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization: The Russian and Soviet Case. In Bureaucracy and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feit, Edward. 1973. The Armed Bureaucrats: Military-Administrative Regimes and Political Development. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fujii, Tadatoshi. 1985. Kokubō Fujinkai [The national defense women's association]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Goodsell, Charles T. 1985. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. 2d ed. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Gordon, Andrew. 1985. The Evolution of Labor Relations in Japan: Heavy Industry, 1853–1955. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hadley, Eleanor M. 1970. Antitrust in Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, Manfred. 1963. The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harik, Iliya. 1973. The Single Party as a Subordinate Movement: The Case of Egypt. World Politics 26:80–105.Google Scholar
Harik, Iliya. 1974. The Political Mobilization of Peasants: A Study of an Egyptian Community. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hashikawa, Bunzō. 1965. Kakushin kanryō. In Kenryoko no shisō [The idea of power], ed. Kamishima, Jirō. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Google Scholar
Heady, Ferrel. 1966. Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kawamo, Ryūzō. 1936. Hōsō jigyō no kantoku hōshin ni tsuite [Concerning plans for the management of the broadcasting business]. Denmu kenkyū shiryō 7:41–47.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1979. White House Years. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin L. 1971. Bureaucratic Man: A Portrait and an Interpretation. American Sociological Review 36:461–74.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph. 1974. Politics within Nations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
LePiere, Richard T. 1965. Social Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Leemans, Arne F. 1976a. A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Reform of Central Government. In The Management of Change in Government, ed. Leemans, Arne F. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leemans, Arne F. 1976b. Overview. In The Management of Change in Government, ed. Leemans, Arne F. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lewis, Eugene. 1980. Public Entrepreneurship: Toward a Theory of Bureaucratic Political Power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham F. 1975. Peru's Ambiguous Revolution. In The Peruvian Experiment: Continuity and Change under Military Rule, ed. Lowenthal, Abraham F. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1952. Bureaucratic Structure and Personality. In Reader in Bureaucracy, ed. Merton, Robert K., Gray, Ailsa P., Hockey, Barbara, and Selvin, Hanan C. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Yoshio. 1942. Hōsō to kokubō kokka [Broadcasting and the national defense state]. Tokyo: Nihon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, Fritz. 1957. The Administrative State: An Introduction to Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Takafusa. 1981. The Postwar Japanese Economy: Its Development and Structure. Trans. Kaminski, Jacqueline. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Notar, Ernest J. 1985. Japan's Wartime Labor Policy: A Search for a Method. Journal of Asian Studies 44:311–28.Google Scholar
Kenkyūjo, Ōhara Shakai Mondai. 1965. Taiheiyō sensōka no rōdō undō [The labor movement during the Pacific war]. Tokyo: Rōdō Junpōsha.Google Scholar
Okumura, Kiwao. 1938. Nihon seiji no kakushin [The renovation of Japanese politics]. Tokyo: Ikuseisha.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 1978. The Politics of Bureaucracy: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Pilar Tello, María del. 1983. Golpe o Revolución? Hablan los Militates del 68 [Coup or revolution] The military officers of 1968 speak/. Vol. 2. Lima: Ediciones SAGSA.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rainey, Hal G., Backoff, Robert W., and Levine, Charles H. 1976. Comparing Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review 36:233–44.Google Scholar
Roessner, J. David. 1977. Incentives to Innovate in Public and Private Organizations. Administration and Society 9:341–65.Google Scholar
Rugh, William A. 1979. The Arab Press: News Media and Political Process in the Arab World. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Semen no jōhō kikō yōran [Survey of the prewar structure of information]. 1964.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1971. Constraints on Innovation in Policy Making: Economic Development and Political Routines. In Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, ed. Marini, Frank. Scranton, PA: Chandler.Google Scholar
Shonfield, Andrew. 1969. Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, Robert. 1971. Nasser: A Political Biography. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Strauss, Eric. 1960. The Ruling Servants: Bureaucracy in Russia, France—and Britain? New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Jun'ichirō. 1957. Nihon eiga hattatsu shi ]The history of Japanese films]. Vol. 2. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron-sha.Google Scholar
Thompson, Victor A. 1969. Bureaucracy and Innovation. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Trimberger, Ellen Kay. 1978. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Uchikawa, Yoshimi, ed. 1973. Masu media tōsei ]Mass media controls]. Vol. 2. Tokyo: Misuzu Shobō.Google Scholar
Waldo, Dwight. 1971. Some Thoughts on Alternatives, Dilemmas, and Paradoxes in a Time of Turbulence. In Public Administration in a Time of Turbulence, ed. Waldo, Dwight. Scranton, PA Chandler.Google Scholar
Waterbury, John. 1983. The Egypt of Nasser and Sadat: The Political Economy of Two Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whyte, William H. Jr. 1956. The Organization Man. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kankokai, Yokusan Undō Shi. 1954. Yokusan kokumin undō shi [History of the national assistance movement]. Tokyo: Kaimeidō.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.