Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:21:25.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 1050 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The correlation (Tau) between ideological proximity and perceived ideological distance was .26 for Senate incumbents and .15 for House incumbents.

3 Two recent studies of campaign spending in congressional elections have concluded that higher spending by challengers significantly improves their performance while spending by incumbents has little effect (Glantz, Abramowitz, and Burkart, 1977; Jacobson, 1978).

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.