Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T12:32:28.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gains Debate: Framing State Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jeffrey Berejekian
Jeffrey Berejekian*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theoretical bifurcation of international relations theory into (neo)realist and (neo)liberal camps has resulted in a “gains debate” that says little about an empirical world in which states exhibit both relative and absolute gains pursuit. This article deploys prospect theory in an attempt to move beyond the gains debate. The intent here is synthetic. By bringing the predictions of both perspectives under a single theoretical umbrella, we can model a broader set of state behavior. The thesis developed demonstrates that states in a gains frame pursue absolute gains and are risk averse, while states in a losses frame pursue relative gains and are risk acceptant. This hypothesis is assessed against the behavior of the European Community in the formation of the Montreal Protocol, a regime intended to protect the earth's protective ozone shield. The new model accurately predicts the timing and content of shifts in EC preferences, suggesting that a synthesis of realist and liberal approaches is possible.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 789 - 805
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38(10):226–54.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David, ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Richard. 1987. Speech before the National Press Club, September 16, 1986. Reproduced in U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Ozone Layer Depletions, 100th Cong., 1st sess., 1987.Google Scholar
Benedick, Richard. 1987. Plenary Statement at Vienna, February 23, as reproduced in U.S. Congress, House Committee on Human Rights and International Organizations, U.S. Participation in International Negotiations on Ozone Protocol, 100th Cong., 1st sess., 1987.Google Scholar
Benedick, Richard. 1991. Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berejekian, Jeffrey. 1992. “Revolutionary Collective Action and the Agent-Structure Problem.” American Political Science Review 86(09):647–57.Google Scholar
Clean Air Act. 1982. § 157(b), 42 U.S.C. § 7457(b).Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 1985. “Chlorofluorocarbons in the environment: updating the situation.” Com(85) final, Brussels, 19 11.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 1986. “Chlorofluorocarbons in the Environment: A reexamination of Control Measures.” Com(86) final, Brussels, 20 November, and Annex.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 1987. 02 19, S 2289.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth. 1990. “Global Environmental Advocacy: Citizen Activism in Protecting the Ozone Layer.” AMBIO 19(Summer): 334–8.Google Scholar
Dotto, Lydo, and Schiff, Harlod. 1978. The Ozone War. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency and United Nations Environmental Program. 1986. Effects of Changes in Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate. Washington DC: EPA, 08.Google Scholar
European Communities. 1982. “Decision 82/795 of 15 November 1982 on the Consolidation of Precautionary Measures Concerning Chlorofluorocarbons in the Environment.” Official Journal of the European Communities: Legal Series 329, 25 November.Google Scholar
European Communities. 1987. “Decision 80/372 of 26 March 1980 Concerning Chlorofluorocarbons in the Environment.” Official Journal of the European Communities: Legal Series 133, 7 06.Google Scholar
Farnham, Barbara. 1994. Avoiding Losses/Taking Risks: Prospect Theory and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42(08):485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph. 1990. Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph. 1993. “Comment.” American Political Science Review 87(09):729–35.Google Scholar
Guest, I. 1985. “U.S. and EC Split on Danger to Ozone.” International Herald Tribune, 29 01.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter. 1992. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Attempts to Protect the Stratospheric Ozone.” International Organization 46(Winter): 187–224.Google Scholar
High, Nigel. 1991. “The European Community and International Environmental Policy” International Environmental Affairs 3(3): 163–80.Google Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, Markus. 1990. “The European Community and the Protection of the Ozone Layer.” Journal of Common Market Studies 28(03):261–77.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1992. “The Political Implications of Loss Aversion.” Political Psychology 13(2):187–204.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. “The Psychology of Preferences.” Scientific American 246(01):160–73.Google Scholar
Kohler, Haaga. 1987. Projections of Consumption of Products Using Chlorofluorocarbons in Developing Countries. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43(04):336–66.Google Scholar
Lammers, Johan. 1988. “Efforts to Develop a Protocol on Chlorofluorocarbons to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.” Hague Yearbook of International Law 1(Winter):225–69.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1992. “Prospect Theory and International Relations: Theoretical Applications and Analytical Problems.” Political Psychology 13(2):283–310.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1995. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice and International Relations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Peace Science Society, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1997. “Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 41(03):87–112.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul. 1987. “Borderline Protection.” New York Times, 12 04.Google Scholar
Litfin, Karen. 1992. “Power and Knowledge in International Environmental Politics: The Case of Stratospheric Ozone Depletion.” Ph.D. diss. University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Litfin, Karen. 1994. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Maddox, John. 1987. “The Great Ozone Controversy.” Nature 329(09 10):101.Google Scholar
Mastaduno, Michael. 1991. “Do Relative Gains Matter: America's Response to Japanese Industrial Policy.” International Security 16(Summer):73–113.Google Scholar
Mastellone, Carlo. 1981. “The External Relations of the EEC in the Field of Environmental Protection.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 30(01):104–17.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(01):67–85.Google Scholar
Molina, M., and Rowland, F.. 1974. “Stratospheric Sink for Chlorofiuoromethanes: Chlorine Atom-Catalyzed Destruction of Ozone.” Nature 249(06 28):810–12.Google Scholar
Morrisett, Peter. 1991. “The Montreal Protocol: Lessons for Formulating Policies for Global Warming.” Policies Studies Journal 19(Spring):793–820.Google Scholar
Munasinghe, Mohan, and King, Kenneth. 1991. “Issues and Options in Implementing the Montreal Protocol in Developing Countries.” Environment Working Paper No. 49. Nairobi: Environment Department, World Bank.Google Scholar
NASA. 1986. Atmospheric Ozone 1985. World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Report, No. 16. 3 vols. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
Parson, Edward. 1992. Protecting the Ozone Layer: The Evolution and Impact of International Institutions. Final Report 92–02, Global Environmental Policy Project. Boston: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85(12):1303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Response.” American Political Science Review 87(09):735–37.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48(Spring):313–44.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games.” International Organization 42(Summer): 427–60.Google Scholar
Quatrone, George, and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82(09):23–36.Google Scholar
Roan, Sharon. 1989. Ozone Crisis: The 15-Year Evolution of a Sudden Global Emergency. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Sand, Peter. 1985. “Protecting the Ozone Layer: The Vienna Convention Is Adopted.” Environment 27(06):19–43.Google Scholar
Shafir, Eldar. 1992. “Prospect Theory and Political Analysis: A Psychological Perspective.” Political Psychology 13(2):311–22.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991a. “International Cooperation among Relative Gains Maximizers.” International Studies Quarterly 35(09): 387–402.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991b. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 85(09):701–26.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1993. “Response.” American Political Science Review 87(09):738–42.Google Scholar
Soroos, Marvin. 1991. “The Evolution of Global Regulation of Atmospheric Pollution.” Policy Sciences Journal 19(2):115–25.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1983. “Coordination and Collaboration Regimes in an Anarchic World.” In International Regimes, ed. Kresner, Stephen. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice. 1989. “Getting to the Table: The Triggers, Stages, Function, and Consequences of Prenegotiation.” In Getting to the Table: The Processes of International Prenegotiation, ed. Stein, Janice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice, and Pauly, Louis. 1993. Choosing to Cooperate: How States Avoid Loss. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Motoshi. 1994. “Economic Interdependence, Relative Gains, and International Cooperation: The Case of Monetary Policy Coordination.” International Studies Quarterly 38(09):475–98.Google Scholar
Szell, Patrick. 1985. “The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.” International Digest of Health Legislation 36(3): 839–42.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahenman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertanty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(September 27): 1124–31.Google Scholar
United Nations Environmental Program. 1986. Doc#UNEP/WG.148/2 and annexes I, II, III.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. 1987a. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Ozone Layer Depletions. 100th Cong., 1st sess.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, House. 1987b. “Ozone Protection and CFC Reduction Act of 1987.” 100th Cong., 1st sess., HR. 2854.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, House. 1987c. “Stratospheric Ozone Protection Act of 1987.” 100th Cong., 1st sess., HR. 2036.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Senate. 1987d. “The Stratospheric Ozone and Climate Protection Act.” 100th Cong., 1st sess., S. 57.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Senate. 1987e. “Stratospheric Protection Act of 1987.” 100th Cong., 1st sess., S. 570.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1991. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Constitution of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(Spring):391–425.Google Scholar
Wirth, David. 1987. Written testimony reproduced in U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Ozone Layer Depleations, 100th Cong., 1st sess. Serial No. 100–7. 1987.Google Scholar
Wright, William, and Anderson, Urton. 1989. “Effects of Situation Familiarity and Financial Incentives on the Use of Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic for Probability Assessment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44(08):68–82.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.