Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:06:07.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germany's Lebensraum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Charles Kruszewski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The most tantalizing problems faced by students of international relations are those which revolve around the question of motivation in national action. The rôle of ideas and attitudes in determining the behavior of nations is an obtrusive factor in every international situation. Among characteristic ideologies appearing as a growing determinant of national action is the German ideology regarding Lebensraum. Here is one of those words which have been in the German language for a very long time, but which has been popularized by the National Socialists. Literally translated, Lebensraum means “living space,” and when interpreted by anyone in Germany it is taken to indicate all that which is necessary for guaranteeing the life and development of the German people—physically, politically, and economically. It embraces all kinds of issues based upon prestige, historical, and geographical considerations. The terms “equal status” and “self-determination,” indefinite though they were, may have seemed to have definite limits; but Lebensraum goes much beyond them. It is the greatest single underlying cause of the war and the keyword of the new empire for which Hitler and his followers are struggling. The Nazis became increasingly convinced that nothing can save Germany except a genuine expansion of her Lebensraum and the unconditional return of her old colonies. This new empire must be consolidated in one compact mass in the center of Europe. First, the people of the same blood—Austrians, Sudeten-Germans—had to be incorporated; then the territory of Bohemia-Moravia, because of its geographical and strategic position, even though its inhabitants were mainly Slavs; while Slovakia had to be granted “independence” on account of “internal” disintegration.

Type
International Affairs
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 1940 , pp. 964 - 975
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weinberg, Albert K., Manifest Destiny; A Study of Nationalist Expansionism in American History (Baltimore, 1935), p. ix.Google Scholar

2 Obst, Erich, “Die Lebensräume der Weltvölker,” Zeitschrift für Politik, Jan.-Feb., 1939, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

3 Spectator (London), Apr. 14, 1939, pp. 625–626.

4 Henning-Thies, , Völkerringen im Ostseeraum (Leipzig, 1939), pp. 93–111.Google Scholar

5 Wiskeman, Elizabeth, “The Drang nach Osten Continues,” Foreign Affairs, 1939, pp. 764–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 British War Blue Book (New York, 1939), pp. 10–11.

7 Rozycki, , “Böhmen und Mähren im Deutschen Lebensraum,” Deutsche Verwaltung, No. 13 (July 10, 1939)Google Scholar; Hahn, Georg, Grundfragen europäischer Ordnung (Berlin, 1939), pp. 82 and 190.Google Scholar

8 Blue Book, op. cit., 58–59.

9 Bargatzki, Walter, Der Sinn der englischen Festlandspolitik (Munich, 1939)Google Scholar; Politik, Hochschule für, Probleme Britischer Reichs- und Aussenpolitik (Berlin, 1939)Google Scholar; Berber, Fritz, Prinzipien der Britischen Aussenpolitik (Berlin, 1939).Google Scholar

10 Fay, S. B., “How War Came,” Events, Oct., 1939.Google Scholar

11 Blue Book, op. cit., p. 81.

12 Facts in Review (New York), Aug. 16, 1939.

13 Schuman, Frederick L., International Politics; An Introduction to the Western State System (New York, 1937), p. 500.Google Scholar

14 Rauschning, Hermann, The Revolution of Nihilism; Warning to the West (New York, 1939), pp. 187–188.Google Scholar

15 Mattern, Johannes, “From Geopolitik to Political Relativism,” in Essays in Political Science in Honor of W. W. Willoughby (Baltimore, 1937), pp. 125–172.Google Scholar

16 Mattern, op. cit., pp. 125–172.

17 For instance, Demangeon, A., “Géographie politique,” Annales de Géographie (1932)Google Scholar: “Cet ensemble des connaissances, décoré du titre de Géopolitique, ne doit pas rester théoretique; il faut lui assigner un but pratique, qui est particulièrement de restaurer l'État allemand dans sa force et sa grandeur”; and Ancel, J., Géopolitique (Paris, 1936).Google Scholar

18 Hartshorne, R., “Recent Developments in Political Geography,” in this Review, Vol. 29, Oct. and Dec., 1935.Google Scholar

19 Whittlesey, Derwent, The Earth and the State (New York, 1939), p. 8.Google Scholar

20 Rauschning, op. cit., p. 186 ff.

21 Wright, John K., “Geography and the Study of Foreign Affairs,” Foreign Affairs, Oct., 1938, pp. 153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also, Spykman, N. J., “Geography and Foreign Policy, I,” in this Review, Feb., 1938, pp. 28–50Google Scholar; also Spykman, N. J. and Rollins, A. A., “Geographic Objectives in Foreign Policy, II,” in this Review, Aug., 1939, pp. 591–614.Google Scholar

22 Haushofer, Karl, Weltpolitik von heute (Berlin, 1936).Google Scholar

23 Triepel, Heinrich, Die Hegemonie: Ein Buch von führenden Staaten (Stuttgart, 1938), pp. 191–200.Google Scholar

24 Wirsing, G., “Die wahre Wurzel des Konflikts,” Das XX. Jahrhundert, Sept., 1939.Google Scholar

25 Hubert, Paul-Louis, “La géopolitique,” ou “le nouveau pangermanisme,” in L'Europe Nouvelle, Apr. 23, 1938, pp. 417–420.Google Scholar

26 Daeberler, H., “Die neuen Aufgaben der Raumordnung,” in Der Deutsche Volkswirt (Berlin, Nov. 10, 1939), pp. 155–156.Google Scholar

27 For instance, Offe, H., “Geopolitik und Naturrecht” in Zeitschrift für Geopolitik (1937), pp. 239–246.Google Scholar

28 See also Hartshorne, Richard, “A Survey of the Boundary Problems of Europe,” in Colby, C. C. (ed.), Geographic Aspects of International Relations (Chicago, 1938).Google Scholar

29 For an additional list of atlases and maps, see Wunderlich, E., “Neue geopolitische zu beachtende Karten und Atlanten,” in Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, Sept., 1938, pp. 750–752.Google Scholar

30 Willoughby, Westel W., Prussian Political Philosophy (New York, 1918), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

31 Mackinder, H. J., “The Geographical Pivot of History,” in Geographical Journal, No. 4, pp. 434–437 (Apr., 1904)Google Scholar—a lecture read to the Royal Geographical Society, London, followed by discussions thereon.

32 See also leading article in Washington Evening Star, Oct. 1, 1939: “Russo-German Entente Follows Path Exposed by ‘Geopolitician’—Idea of Briton, Sir Halford Mackinder, Traced to Ears of Hitler After Lying Dormant for a Generation.”

33 Haushofer, Karl, Raumüberwindende Mächte (Leipzig, 1934), p. 76.Google Scholar

34 Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, Aug.-Sep., 1939, p. 681.

35 Ibid., p. 638.

36 Jessup, P. C., “The Reality of International Law,” Foreign Affairs, Jan. 1940, p. 246.Google Scholar

37 Hans Keller, K. E. L., Das Recht der Völker: I. Abschied vom Völkerrecht (Berlin, 1938).Google Scholar See also Huber, Ernst Rudolf, Verfassung, paragraph on “Volk und Raum” (Hamburg, 1937), pp. 58–60Google Scholar; Fur, Louis Le, Les grands Problèmes du Droit (Paris, 1937), pp. 378–388Google Scholar; Mankiewicz, H., Le Nationalsocialisme Allemand (Paris, 1937)Google Scholar; Giese, F. und Menzel, E., Vom deutschen Völkerrechtsdenken der Gegenwart (Frankfurt, 1938)Google Scholar; Petraschek, Karl, System der Philosophie des Staates und des Völkerrechts (Zürich, 1938).Google ScholarBristier, Eduard, Die Völkerrechtslehre des Nationalsozialismus (Zürich, 1938)Google Scholar; Hahn, op. cit.; Noack, Ulrich, Das Politische Ethos in der Europäischen Diplomatie (Hamburg, 1939).Google ScholarFournier, Jacques, La Conception Nationale-Socialiste du Droit des Gens (Paris, 1939)Google Scholar; Preuss, Lawrence, “National Socialist Conceptions of International Law,” in this Review, Aug., 1935, pp. 594–609Google Scholar; Gott, Virginia L., “The National Socialist Theory of International Law,” Amer. Jour. of Internat. Law, Oct., 1938, pp. 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Schmitt, Carl, Völkerrechtliche Grossraumordnung—Mit Interventionsverbot für raumfremde Mächte (Berlin, 1938).Google Scholar See also article by same author: “Grossraum gegen Universalismus—Der völkerrechtliche Kampf um die Monroedoktrin,” in Zeitschrift der Akademie für Deutsches Recht, May 15, 1939; and for similar statements, Schoenemann, F., Die aggressive Wirtschaftspolitik der Vereinigten Staaten in Südamerika und die Stellung Deutschlands (Stuttgart, 1939), pp. 11–28.Google Scholar

39 Freytagh-Loringhoven, Axel Freiherr von, Deutschlands Aussenpolitik 1933–1939 (Berlin, 1939).Google Scholar

40 Amt, Auswärtiges, Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des Weltkrieges (German White Book), No. 2 (Berlin, 1939).Google Scholar

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.