Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T02:20:13.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greed, Envy, and Admiration: The Distinct Nature of Public Opinion about Redistribution from the Rich

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2022

KRISTINA JESSEN HANSEN Open the ORCID record for KRISTINA JESSEN HANSEN [Opens in a new window]
KRISTINA JESSEN HANSEN*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
*
Kristina Jessen Hansen, Assistant Professor, Department of Politics and Society, Aalborg University, Denmark, kjh@dps.aau.dk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on public opinion about economic redistribution has made important progress by incorporating the psychological microfoundation that shapes support for redistribution to the poor. However, one piece is missing: the microfoundation shaping support for redistribution from the rich. I provide a novel theory about this facet of redistributive attitudes and how it is distinct. Observational data from three nationally representative samples in two different welfare systems and an experiment show that attitudes about taking from the rich are mainly driven by perceptions of their prosociality—whether they are greedy or generous. This contrasts with public opinion about giving to the poor that is mainly driven by perceptions of the efforts of poor people. Furthermore, while compassion shapes attitudes about giving to the poor, the emotions of admiration and envy shape attitudes about taking from the rich. These findings have important theoretical and empirical implications for public opinion about economic redistribution.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 217 - 234
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarøe, Lene, and Petersen, Michael Bang. 2014. “Crowding out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues.” The Journal of Politics 76 (3): 684–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Angeletos, George-Marios. 2005. “Fairness and Redistribution.” American Economic Review 95 (4): 960–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, and Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. “Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001 (2): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Stantcheva, Stefanie, and Teso, Edoardo. 2018. “Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution.” American Economic Review 108 (2): 521–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, Wil, Hermkens, Piet, and van Wijck, Peter. 1995. “Justice Evaluation of Income Distribution in East and West.” In Social Justice and Political Change, eds. Kluegel, James R., Mason, David S., and Wegener, Bernd, 131–50. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard-Rosa, Cameron, Martin, Lucy, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2017. “The Structure of American Income Tax Policy Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 2013. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burak, Esra. 2013. “The Social Maximum: American Attitudes toward Extremely High Incomes.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 31 (March): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaillé, Charlotte, and Trump, Kris-Stella. 2015. “The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 77 (1): 146–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavanne, David. 2016. “Redistributive Preferences and the Dimensionality of Self-Determination and Luck.” Review of Behavioral Economics 3 (3–4): 359–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, Meghan, and Wichowsky, Amber. 2020. “Inequality in the Social Mind: Social Comparison and Support for Redistribution.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo, and Grüner, Hans Peter. 2002. “Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 83 (1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durante, Ruben, Putterman, Louis, and van der Weele, Joël. 2014. “Preferences for Redistribution and Perception of Fairness: An Experimental Study.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (4): 1059–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D. R., and Kelley, Jonathan. 2007. “Population Size, Economic Development, and Attitudes towards Inequality: Evidence from 30 Nations.” Population Review 46 (2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D. R., and Kelley, Jonathan. 2018. “Strong Welfare States Do Not Intensify Public Support for Income Redistribution, but Even Reduce It among the Prosperous: A Multilevel Analysis of Public Opinion in 30 Countries.” Societies 8 (4): article 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, Jonathan, and Peoples, Clayton D.. 2010. “Justifications of Inequality: The Normative Basis of Pay Differentials in 31 Nations.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (5): 1405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Amy, J. C. Cuddy, Glick, Peter, and Xu, Jun. 2002. “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (6): 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Amy, J. C. Cuddy, and Glick, Peter. 2007. “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2): 77–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, Christina. 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 82 (2): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, Christina M., Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 2006. “Strong Reciprocity and the Welfare State.” In Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, vol. 2, eds. Kolm, Serge-Christophe and Ythier, Jean Mercier, 1439–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Franko, William, Tolbert, Caroline J., and Witko, Christopher. 2013. “Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for ‘Robin Hood’ Tax Policies.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4): 923–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, Laura K., Migueis, Marco, and Parsa, Sahar. 2017. “Redistributive Choices and Increasing Income Inequality: Experimental Evidence for Income as a Signal of Deservingness.” Experimental Economics 20 (4): 894–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, Jennifer L., Keltner, Dacher, and Simon-Thomas, Emiliana. 2010. “Compassion: An Evolutionary Analysis and Empirical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (3): 351–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurven, Michael, and Jaeggi, Adrian V.. 2015. “Food Sharing.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Scott, Robin A. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hadler, Markus. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Different Income Ratios? A Multi-Level Comparison of Thirty Countries.” Acta Sociologica 48 (2): 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Kristina Jessen. 2022. “Replication Data for: Greed, Envy, and Admiration: The Distinct Nature of Public Opinion about Redistribution from the Rich.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AZUWVA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Thomas J. 2014. “Do Citizens Link Attitudes with Preferences? Economic Inequality and Government Spending in the ‘New Gilded Age’: Linking Attitudes with Preferences.” Social Science Quarterly 95 (2): 468–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Alford, John R.. 2004. “Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Cooperators.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Sarah E., and Buss, David M.. 2008. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Envy.” In Envy: Theory and Research, ed. Smith, Richard H., 60–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Suzanne R., and Dovidio, John F.. 2017. “The Rich—Love Them or Hate Them? Divergent Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward the Wealthy.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20 (1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Mads M. 2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 25 (6): 723–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasso, Guillermina, and Rossi, Peter H.. 1977. “Distributive Justice and Earned Income.” American Sociological Review 42 (4): 639–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Jonathan, and Evans, M. D. R.. 1993. “The Legitimation of Inequality: Occupational Earnings in Nine Nations.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (1): 75–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J., and Enns, Peter K.. 2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-Reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 855–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and McCall, Leslie. 2008. “Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution.” Socio-Economic Review 6 (1): 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Judd B., and Norton, Michael I.. 2016. “Tax Aversion in Labor Supply.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Taxation, Social Norms and Compliance 124 (April): 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Elliot R.. 1986. Beliefs about In-Equality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York: Aldine De Gruyte.Google Scholar
Krawczyk, Michał. 2010. “A Glimpse through the Veil of Ignorance: Equality of Opportunity and Support for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (1–2): 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunovich, Sheri, and Slomczynski, Kazimierz M.. 2007. “Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-Industrial Societies” European Sociological Review 23 (5): 649–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Jens, and Crusius, Jan. 2015. “The Tango of Two Deadly Sins: The Social-Functional Relation of Envy and Pride.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109 (3): 453–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, Christian Albrekt. 2007. “The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Christian Albrekt, and Dejgaard, Thomas E.. 2013. “The Institutional Logic of Images of the Poor and Welfare Recipients: A Comparative Study of British, Swedish and Danish Newspapers.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold Dwight. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: P. Smith.Google Scholar
Laustsen, Lasse, and Bor, Alexander. 2017. “The Relative Weight of Character Traits in Political Candidate Evaluations: Warmth Is More Important Than Competence, Leadership and Integrity.” Electoral Studies 49 (October): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chien-An, and Bates, Timothy C.. 2020. “Who Supports Redistribution? Replicating and Refining Effects of Compassion, Malicious Envy, and Self-Interest.” Evolution and Human Behavior 42 (2): 140–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maner, Jon K. 2017. “Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6): 526–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClendon, Gwyneth H. 2018. Envy in Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Jared. 2020. “Avoiding the Hypothetical: Why ‘Mirror Experiments’ Are an Essential Part of Survey Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32 (2): 266–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mijs, Jonathan J. B. 2019. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.” Socio-Economic Review 19 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Norton, Michael I. 2014. “Unequality: Who Gets What and Why It Matters.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1): 151–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Michael I., and Ariely, Dan. 2011. “Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 9–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2020. Inequality—Income Inequality [computer file].Google Scholar
Onu, Diana, Kessler, Thomas, and Smith, Joanne R.. 2016. “Admiration: A Conceptual Review.” Emotion Review 8 (3): 218–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997.” American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang. 2012. “Social Welfare as Small-Scale Help: Evolutionary Psychology and the Deservingness Heuristic.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, Michael Bang. 2015. “Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics.” Political Psychology 36 (S1): 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang, Sznycer, Daniel, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 2012. “Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare.” Political Psychology 33 (3): 395–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piston, Spencer. 2018. Class Attitudes in America: Sympathy for the Poor, Resentment of the Rich, and Political Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Michael E., and Van Vugt, Mark. 2014. “The Evolution of Leader-Follower Reciprocity: The Theory of Service-for-Prestige.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (June): article 363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, Matthew. 1993. “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.” The American Economic Review 83 (5): 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Ragusa, Jordan Michael. 2014. “Socioeconomic Stereotypes Explaining Variation in Preferences for Taxing the Rich.” American Politics Research 43 (2): 327–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodon, Toni, and Sanjaume-Calvet, Marc. 2019. “How Fair Is It? An Experimental Study of Perceived Fairness of Distributive Policies.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roex, Karlijn L. A., Huijts, Tim, and Sieben, Inge. 2019. “Attitudes towards Income Inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘Losers’ of the Perceived Meritocracy.” Acta Sociologica 62 (1): 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlingson, Karen, and Connor, Stuart. 2011. “The ‘Deserving’ Rich? Inequality, Morality and Social Policy.” Journal of Social Policy 40 (3): 437–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadin, Meredith L. 2014. “A Wealth of Ambivalence: How Stereotypes about the Rich Matter for Political Attitudes and Candidate Choice.” PhD diss. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Sands, Melissa L. 2017. “Exposure to Inequality Affects Support for Redistribution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (4): 663–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, Simone M., and Castillo, Juan C.. 2015. “Poverty Attributions and the Perceived Justice of Income Inequality: A Comparison of East and West Germany.” Social Psychology Quarterly 78 (3): 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard H., and Kim, Sung Hee. 2007. “Comprehending Envy.” Psychological Bulletin 133 (1): 46–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Richard H., Turner, Terence J., Garonzik, Ron, Leach, Colin W., Urch-Druskat, Vanessa, and Weston, Christine M.. 1996. “Envy and Schadenfreude.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (2): 158–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Phillip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starmans, Christina, Sheskin, Mark, and Bloom, Paul. 2017. “Why People Prefer Unequal Societies.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (4): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetman, Joseph, Spears, Russell, Livingstone, Andrew G., and Antony, S. R. Manstead. 2013. “Admiration Regulates Social Hierarchy: Antecedents, Dispositions, and Effects on Intergroup Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (3): 534–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sznycer, Daniel, Seal, Maria Florencia Lopez, Sell, Aaron, Lim, Julian, Porat, Roni, Shalvi, Shaul, Halperin, Eran, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 2017. “Support for Redistribution Is Shaped by Compassion, Envy, and Self-Interest, but Not a Taste for Fairness.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (31): 8420–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sznycer, Daniel, and Lukaszewski, Aaron W.. 2019. “The Emotion–Valuation Constellation: Multiple Emotions Are Governed by a Common Grammar of Social Valuation.” Evolution and Human Behavior 40 (4): 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thal, Adam. 2020. “The Desire for Social Status and Economic Conservatism among Affluent Americans.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 426–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trump, Kris-Stella. 2018. “Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 929–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, Wim. 2000. “Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public.” Policy & Politics 28 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hansen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AZUWVA
Link
Supplementary material: File

Hansen supplementary material

Hansen supplementary material

Download Hansen supplementary material(File)
File 557.4 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.