Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T16:24:10.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Movement and Democracy: Sokagakkai in Japanese Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James W. White
James W. White*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With a claimed membership of over 12 million members, possession of over 1000 seats in local and national legislative assemblies, a widespread domestic reputation, and a sensationalistic treatment in the foreign press, the Sokagakkai has come in recent years to be a subject of some academic, and much religious and political interest in both Japan and the United States. An organization of lay believers of the Sho sect of Nichiren Buddhism (noted for its intolerance and vigorous propagation methods), the Sokagakkai has gone into Japanese politics with a striking degree of success; the extent to which it has brought its religious characteristics into the political sphere and the question of whether such religious groups should be in that sphere at all are at present the focus of considerable debate in Japan.

Most criticisms of the Sokagakkai have to date concentrated upon its religious activities, its doctrinal truth or falsehood, its alleged militaristic tendencies, and the proper place of religion in the political system of a secular state, I would like to touch on some of the social (or antisocial) functions performed by the Sokagakkai in Japanese society, as proclaimed by the Gakkai itself and as evidenced in the Gakkai's performance, and on the implications of these social functions for the Japanese political process.

As its name, the “Value-Creation Society,” suggests, the Sokagakkai postulates pursuit of absolute happiness by means of the creation of certain values in one's life as the proper direction of human life. So that all men may be able to achieve this happiness, the Gakkai emphasizes equality of all men; so that they may be fully able to enjoy their values, the Gakkai stresses freedom. Absolute freedom, equality, and happiness may be sought by the individual through religious faith; the agency for the realization of these ideals for society and the world is the political system.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , September 1967 , pp. 744 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1967 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Daisaku, Ikeda, Seiji to Shukyo (Tokyo: Hoshoin, 1965), pp. 160–161.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., pp. 211–212.

3 Ibid., pp. 90–91, 104–105.

4 Ibid., pp. 99, 130, 139; Sokagakkai, Overseas Bureau, Sokagakkai and Komeito, “This is the Sokagakkai” series 6 (Tokyo: Seikyo Press, 1965 (?), p. 17.Google Scholar

5 Ikeda, op. cit., pp. 137–138, 95.

6 Hiroi, Takase, Komeito, Tokyo, Gakushu Kenkyusha, 1964, p. 137 Google Scholar; Ikeda, op. cit., pp. 146–147.

7 Ikeda, op. cit., pp. 1 (Introduction by Hojo Hiroshi), 140, 266.

8 Takase, op. cit., p. 155.

9 “This is the Sokagakkai” series 6, pp. 11–12.

10 Takase, op. cit., p. 174.

11 Ikeda, op. cit., pp. 235, 246; Takase, op. cit., pp. 183–186.

12 Ikeda, op. cit., pp. 259ff.

13 Sokagakkai, Overseas Bureau, The Buddhist Democracy, “This is the Sokagakkai” series 7 (Tokyo: Seikyo Press, 1965 (?), pp. 8ffGoogle Scholar; Takehisa, Tsuji, “Komeito no Kihon Seisaku,” Ekonomisuto, 43 (September 7, 1965), p. 53 Google Scholar; Takase, op. cit., pp. 227–229.

14 Akio, Saki, “Komeito no Seisaku o Hihan suru,” Zenei, no. 238 (July, 1965), p. 206 Google Scholar; Takase, op. cit., pp. 214, 256–257.

15 Takase, op. cit., pp. 244, 248–249, 253; Tsuji, op. cit., pp. 53–54.

16 Takase, op. cit., pp. 258, 216.

17 Ibid., p. 62.

18 Ikeda, op. cit., p. 1 (Preface); Sokagakkai, Overseas Bureau, What is Shakubuku?, “This is the Sokagakkai” series 8 (Tokyo: Seikyo Press, 1965 (?), p. 9.Google Scholar

19 Takase, op. cit., p. 211; Christian Science Monitor, April 25, 1966, p. 11.

20 Tsuji, op. cit., p. 55; Takase, op. cit., p. 220.

21 Christian Science Monitor, May 2, May 3, 1966. N.B.: these interviews were given to a foreign publication and thus differ from what is provided for domestic consumption. Whether it is more or less truthful than domestically-expressed views Ls unknown.

22 Tsuji, op. cit., p. 55; Mitsuo, Miyata, “Shukyo Seito to Minshushugi,” in Sekai, no. 233, May, 1965, p. 158.Google Scholar

23 Ramseyer, Robert L., “The Soka Gakkai,” in Studies in Japanese Culture: 1, Center for Japanese Studies, Occasional Papers 9 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965), pp. 158–159 Google Scholar; Tsutomu, Shiobara, “Sokagakkai Ideorogii,” in Tembo, no. 78, June, 1965, p. 37.Google Scholar

24 “This is the Sokagakkai” series 7, pp. 9ff.; Ikeda, op. cit., p. 208; compare with Takase, op. cit., pp. 205–206, 267.

25 Especially relevant regarding this phenomenon: Dator's, James excellent article, “The Soka Gakkai: A Socio-Political Interpretation,” in Contemporary Religions in Japan, 6 (September, 1965), pp. 207–208 Google Scholar; Fromm, Erich, Escape From Freedom (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961), passim.Google Scholar

26 Christian Science Monitor, April 29, 1966.

27 Dator, op. cit., p. 217.

28 Ibid., pp. 213–214.

29 Takeshi, Muramatsu, “Nihon no Kindaika to Nichirenshu,” in Chuo Koron, 80 (March, 1965), pp. 53–54 Google Scholar; Bloom, Alfred, “Observations in the Study of Contemporary Nichiren Buddhism,” in Contemporary Religions in Japan, 6 (March, 1965), p. 70 Google Scholar; Akio, Saki, “Komeito no Seisaku to Honshitsu,” Ekonomisuto, 43 (July 27, 1965), p. 38.Google Scholar

30 Shigeo, Murakami, “Komeito no Seiji Kodo,” in Sekai, no. 233, May 1965, pp. 167–168.Google Scholar

31 Loc. cit.

32 Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963), p. 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Ibid., pp. 307, 318, 320; Kornhauser, William, The Politics of Mass Society (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1959), p. 138 Google Scholar; Lederer, Emil, State of the Masses (New York: Norton, 1940), pp. 147–150.Google Scholar

34 Murakami, op. cit., pp. 158–159, 166–167.

35 Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man (Garden City: Doubleday, 1960), ch. 4Google Scholar passim; Tinder, Glen, The Crisis of Political Imagination (New York: Scribner's, 1964), pp. 109ff.Google Scholar

36 McClosky, Herbert, “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics,” this Review, 58 (June, 1964), pp. 364–365.Google Scholar

37 Adorno, T. W., et al., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper, 1950), pp. 206–207 Google Scholar; Lipset, op. cit., pp. 91–92; Riesman, David et al., The Lonely Crowd (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961), pp. xxii–iii Google Scholar; Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, Paul, Personal Influence (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1955), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar

38 McClosky, op. cit., p. 378.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.