Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T08:28:08.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Household Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William James Booth
William James Booth*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the revival of scholarly interest in Marx's relationship to one of the greatest of his teachers, Aristotle, a crucial aspect has been undervalued: Marx's indebtedness to ancient political economy. While Marx employed the methods and key concepts of the economic science of his day in analyzing capitalism, he embedded that explanation in a higher-order theory of the economy. This theory, derived from the Aristotelian account of the household economy, seeks to situate the economy in an overarching account of the community, its purposiveness, and the place within it of activity, time, and domination. Marx sought thereby to illuminate the historical uniqueness of capitalism and, relatedly, to show the bounded character of the economic science (including his own) appropriate to the understanding of it. Central elements of the Aristotelian critique of an economy given over to Midas-like acquisition also find their way into Marx's evaluation of capitalism, and the ideal of the ancient oikos forms one of the core parts of Marx's theory of communism as the new household economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 59 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aelian, . 1974. Varia Historia, ed. Dilts, M. R.. Leipzig: BSB B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1932. The Politics. Trans. Rackham, H.. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1934. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. Rhetoric. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. (vol. 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Athenaeus, . 1929. The Deipnosophists. Trans. Gulick, C. B.. 7 vols. (vol. 3). London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C. 1953. “The Idler's Paradise in Attic Comedy.” Greece and Rome 22:49–60.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. 1986. Interpreting the World: Kant's Philosophy of History and Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. 1989a. “Gone Fishing: Making Sense of Marx's Concept of Communism.” Political Theory 17:205–22.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. 1989b. “Explaining Capitalism: The Method of Marx's Political Economy.” Political Studies 37:612–25.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. 1990. “Households, Markets, and Firms.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. 1991. “Economies of Time: On the Idea of Time in Marx's Political Economy.” Political Theory 19:7–27.Google Scholar
Booth, William James. N.d. “The Limits of Autonomy: Karl Marx's Kant Critique.” In The Starry Heavens and the Moral Law, ed. Beiner, Ronald S. and Booth, William J.. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. 1956. Neue Weg der Sozialgeschichte. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1978. “From Marx to Aristotle, from Aristotle to Us.” Social Research 45:667–738.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A. 1977. “Labor, Leisure, and a Distinctive Contradiction of Advanced Capitalism.” In Markets and Morals, ed. Dworkin, Gerald. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A. 1978. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1985. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1986. “Self-realization in Work and Politics: The Marxist Conception of the Good Life.” Social Philosophy & Policy 3:97–126.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. 1982. Economy and Society in Ancient Greece. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. 1983. Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. W. 1975. “Theory, Evidence, and the Ancient Economy.” Journal of Roman Studies 65:164–71.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Alan. 1984. “Marx's Moral Realism.” In After Marx, ed. Ball, Terence and Farr, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. 1986. The Mental and the Material: Thought, Economy, and Society. Trans. Thorn, Martin. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Gerald A. 1982. “Economic Behavior in the Ancient World.” In Explorations in the New Economic History, ed. Ransom, Roger L., Sutch, Richard, and Walton, Gary W.. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes. 1976. The Theory of Need in Marx. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Hodges, Henry. 1970. Technology in the Ancient World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. 1978. Anthropology and the Greeks. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe. 1984. Le libéralisme moderne: Analyse d'une raison économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness. Trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. 1980. “Marx on Aristotle: Freedom, Money, and Politics.” Review of Metaphysics 34:351–67.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1963–1971. Theories of Surplus Value. 3 vols. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1970. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundrisse. Trans. Nicolaus, Martin. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975a. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Vol. 3 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975b. Comments on James Mill. Vol. 3 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976a. Manifesto of the Communist Party. Vol. 6 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976b. The Poverty of Philosophy. Vol. 6 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976c. Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Manuskript 1861-1863). Vol. 2.3.1 of Karl Marx: Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1977–1981. Capital. 3 vols. Trans. Fowkes, Ben and Fernbach, David. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Vol. 11 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1981. “Xenophon: Von der Haushaltungskunst.” In Exzerpte und Notizen: 1843 bis Januar 1845. Vol. 4.2 of Karl Marx. Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1982. Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Manuskript 1861-1863). Vol. 2.3.6 of Karl Marx. Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick. 1976. The German Ideology. Vol. 5 of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Meikle, Scott. 1979. “Aristotle and the Political Economy of the Polis.” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 99:57–73.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard W. 1984. Analyzing Marx: Morality, Power, and History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1977. “Markets and Other Allocation Systems in History: The Challenge of Karl Polanyi.” Journal of European Economic History 6:703–16.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. N.d. “Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pagano, Ugo. 1985a. “Single-Firm and Anti-Firm Communism: Contradictions and Evolution in the Marxian Alternatives to Capitalism.” In Marx en perspective, ed. Chavance, Bernard. Paris: Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Pagano, Ugo. 1985b. Work and Welfare in Economie Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. “Aristotle Discovers the Economy.” In Trade and Market in the Early Empires, ed. Arensberg, Conrad M., Pearson, Harry W., and Polanyi, Karl. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. “Material Interests, Class Compromise, and the Transition to Socialism.” In Analytical Marxism, ed. Roemer, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim. 1969. Metaphysik und Politik: Studien zu Aristoteles und Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de 1975. “Karl Marx and the History of Classical, Antiquity.” Arethusa 8:7–41.Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de 1981. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de 1985. “Karl Marx and the Interpretation of Ancient and Modern History.” In Marx en perspective, ed. Chavance, Bernard. Paris: Éditions de l'Écoles des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1984. Resources, Values, and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1976. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel's Phenomenology of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. 1989. “What Is ‘Right’ in Hegel's Philosophy of Right?” American Political Science Review 83:3–18.Google Scholar
Stocks, J. L. 1936. “Scholē.” Classical Quarterly 30:177–87.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1978. Land, Labour, and Economic Discourse. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean Pierre. 1969. Myth et pensée chez les Grecs. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. 1983. Le chasseur noir: Formes de pensée et formes de société dans le monde grec. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, Pierre, and Austin, Michael M.. 1977. Economie and Social History of Ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Vol. 1. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Trans. Fischoff, Ephraim et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Welskopf, Elisabeth Charlotte. 1962. Probleme der Musse im alten Hellas. Berlin: Ruetten & Loening.Google Scholar
Welskopf, Elisabeth Charlotte. 1976. “loisir et esclavage dans la Grèce antique.” In Actes du Colloque 1973 sur L'Esclavage. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Whelen, Frederick G. 1983. “Marx and Revolutionary Virtue.” In Marxism, Nomos XXVI, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Will, Édouard. 1972. Le monde grec et l'orient. Vol. 1. Paris: Presses Universitaires de france.Google Scholar
Xenophon, . 1914. Cyropaedia. Trans. Miller, Walter. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Xenophon, . 1968. Oeconomicus in Xenophon in Seven Volumes (vol. 4). Trans. Marchant, E. C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.