No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Notes from the Editors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2014
Extract
In this issue of the Review (108.1) we present a number of articles that illustrate the importance of cross disciplinary research in promoting innovations in the field. These include works that draw upon physical anthropology, theology, and genetics to add insights regarding political development, political ethics, and voting behavior. Further, consistent with our commitment to publish pieces that speak broadly to the field, in this issue there are a number of pieces that, although they appear to be focused on particular issues or countries, address themes that should have broad appeal to many different subfields in political science. In this way we hope to promote greater conversations across subfields, which we believe to be the basis for further innovation in our discipline.
- Type
- From the Editor: In This Issue
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014
References
2 One widely accepted guide to such norms is given by the American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics, particularly Section III. http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf
3 Behavior Genetics 42 (2012): 1–2, DOI 10.1007/s10519–011-9504-zvi CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.