Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:53:20.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard L. Hall
Richard L. Hall*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Participation in committee decision making is an important form of legislative behavior but one we know little about. I develop a model of committee participation and test it using data drawn from staff interviews and records of the House Committee on Education and Labor. The analysis confirms that congressmen are purposive actors, but it also shows that different interests incite participation on different issues and that motivational effects vary in predictable ways across legislative contexts. If members are purposive, however, they also face a variable set of opportunities and constraints that structure their ability to act. Members and especially leaders of the reporting subcommittee, for instance, enjoy advantages in terms of information, staff, and lines of political communication. At the same time, freshman status entails behavioral constraints despite the reputed demise of apprenticeship in legislative life. Understanding such patterns of interest and ability, I conclude, should permit us to illuminate several larger questions regarding decision making and representation in a decentralized Congress.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 105 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the Bureaucracy: A Theory of Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Herbert. 1975. The Changing Status of the Freshman Representative. In Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform, ed. Ornstein, Norman J.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. 1976. Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92nd Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1:201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Holbert N. 1958. The House of Representatives and Foreign Affairs. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Clapp, Charles L. 1963. The Congressman: His Work As He Sees It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Roger. 1981. Subcommittee Government: New Channels for Policymaking. In The New Congress, ed. Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1985. Subcommittees in Congress. In Congress Reconsidered, 3d ed., ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1977. Congress and the Quest for Power. In Congress Reconsidered, ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1985. The House in Transition: Partisanship and Opposition. In Congress Reconsidered, 3d ed., ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1984. Legislative Committee Assignments. Legislative Studies Quarterly 9:587–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1966. The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1975. Purposive Models of Legislative Behavior. American Economic Review 65:407–14.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1986. Rules, Jurisdictions, and Outcomes: An Event Study of Energy Taxation Legislation in the 93rd Congress. California Institute of Technology. Typeset.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1986. Participation in Committee Decision Making. Ph.D. diss. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Evans, C. Lawrence. 1985. The Role of the Subcommittee in Committee Decision Making: An Exploration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara. 1975. Policy Content, Committee Membership, and Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 19:543–58.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Manley, John F. 1970. The Politics of Finance. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1959. The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness. American Political Science Review 53:1064–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Thomas J. 1978. Controlling Legislative Time. In The House at Work, ed. Cooper, Joseph and Mackenzie, G. Calvin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J. 1981. The House and the Senate in a New Congress. In The New Congress, ed. Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Panning, William H. 1983. Formal Models of Legislative Processes. Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 427–55.Google Scholar
Payne, James L. 1980. Show Horses and Work Horses in the U.S. House of Representatives. Polity 12:428–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Lynette P. 1980. Influences of Members' Goals on their Committee Behavior: The U.S. House Judiciary Committee. Legislative Studies Quarterly 5:373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, David E. 1972. Who Makes the Laws? Creativity and Power in Senate Committees. Cambridge: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1977. Review of Congressmen in Committees, by Fenno, Richard F. Jr.American Political Science Review 71:701–03.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1978. Policymaking in Congressional Committees: The Impact of Environmental Factors. American Political Science Review 72:548–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, David E. 1985. Congressional Committees in the Policy Process. In Congress Reconsidered. 3d ed., ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1974. Committee Reform in the House of Representatives and the Subcommittee Bill of Rights. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 411:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1981a. Congressional Staff Turnover and the Ties-That-Bind. American Political Science Review 75:381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1981b. U.S. Congressmen as Enterprise. Legislative Studies Quarterly 6:559–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1986. The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power. Washington University, St. Louis. Typescript.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Purposive Behavior in the U.S. Congress: A Review Essay. Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:117–31.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Deering, Christopher J.. 1984. Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sydney, and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert, Boyd, Thomas, Goodman, Marshall, and Gross, Debra. 1982. Reelection and Constituency Service as State Legislator Goals: It's Just Part of the Job. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.