Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T02:14:18.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pensions for Public Employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Extract

During 1918–20 twenty-four states enacted some form of pension legislation for public officials and employees. Congress established a retirement system for civil service employees. Various Canadian provinces, several British colonial governments, and a few European states legislated in favor of civil pensions.

In the United States this recent activity is the culmination of a half century of agitation, experimentation and controversy in the matter of civil pensions, whether national, state, county or municipal. Private pensions in various American industries have doubtless favorably influenced the development of government pensions.

This development has resulted in the use of many conflicting definitions of the term “pension.” Due to some aversion to that word, many confusing substitute terms have been used such as: retirement system, vocational insurance, deferred pay, indefinite leave of absence, retiring salary, graduated bonus, gratuity, annuity, superannuation allowance, service relief, old age assurance, provident fund, actuarial equivalent, and public officers' guarantee fund. As used in this article the term civil pension is intended to imply a regular allowance granted to a person for that person's maintenance or the maintenance of one or more persons dependent on the pensioner, that allowance being usually paid in consideration of the pensioner's meritorious services to the grantee; but it may be granted as a deferred wage or salary, as an annuity or as a form of regularly paid charity without reference to any consideration of gratuity, of wages, or of deferred dividends.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Pension Funds of the City of New York, pt. 3, p. 11.

2 Ibid., pt. 2, p. 3.

3 Ibid., p. 1.

4 Report of the New York Commission on Pensions (1920).

5 Ibid.

6 See American Political Science Review, Vol. 12, p. 267.

7 New Jersey, Joint Resolution No. 3 (1918).

8 Wisconsin Acts (1919), ch. 514.Google Scholar

9 Report of the Milwaukee Pension Laws Commission (1920).

10 Report of the Massachusetts Legislative Joint Special Committee on Pensions (1921), p. 9.

11 Report of the Massachusetts Legislative Joint Special Committee on Pedsions (1921), p. 9.

12 Ibid., p. 51.

13 Studensky, , Teachers' Pension Systems in the United States, p. 136.Google Scholar

14 Meriam, , Principles governing the Retirement of Public Employees, pp. 325326.Google Scholar

15 Report of the Massachusetts Legislative Joint Special Committee on Pensions (1921), p. 43.

16 Ibid., p. 46.

17 Minnesota Session Laws (1919), ch. 430, p. 504.Google Scholar

18 New York Session Laws (1919), pp. 1161, 1505.Google Scholar

19 New York Session Laws (1920), pp. 427, 1056.Google Scholar

20 New Jersey Session Laws (1919), ch. 109, p. 260.Google Scholar

21 Illinois Session Laws (1919), p. 700.Google Scholar

22 Massachusetts Session Laws (1920), ch. 79, p. 131.Google Scholar

23 Oregon Acts (1919), ch. 277, p. 453.Google Scholar

24 New Jersey Session Laws (1920), ch. 160, p. 325.Google Scholar

25 Massachusetts Session Laws (1920), ch. 60, p. 39.Google Scholar

26 Kentucky Acts (1920), ch. 28, p. 110.Google Scholar

27 Oklahoma Session Laws (1919), ch. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar

28 Missouri Session Laws (1910), p. 582.Google Scholar

29 Kansas Acts (1919), ch. 116, p. 161.Google Scholar

30 Illinois Session Laws (1919), p. 743.Google Scholar

31 Minnesota Session Laws (1919), ch. 68, p. 68.Google Scholar

32 Utah Session Laws (1919), ch. 45, p. 108.Google Scholar

33 Montana Session Laws (1919), ch. 66, p. 127.Google Scholar

34 Washington Session Laws (1919), ch. 196, p. 668.Google Scholar

35 Connecticut Acts (1919), ch. 277, pp. 2948.Google Scholar

36 Minnesota Session Laws (1919), ch. 152.Google Scholar

37 California Acts (1919), p. 101.Google Scholar

38 Wisconsin Acts (1919), ch. 262, p. 284.Google Scholar

39 Massachusetts Acts (1919), ch. 115, p. 78.Google Scholar

40 Maryland Session Laws (1920), ch. 69, p. 130.Google Scholar

41 Iowa Session Laws (1919), ch. 344, p. 447.Google Scholar

42 California Acts (1919), ch. 373, p. 782.Google Scholar

43 Oregon, Acts (1919), ch. 268, p. 444.Google Scholar

44 New York Session Laws (1918), p. 1003.Google Scholar

45 Pennsylvania Session Laws (1919), No. 100, p. 138.Google Scholar

46 New Jersey Session Laws (1918), ch. 164, p. 489.Google Scholar

47 Massachusetts General Acts (1918), ch. 104, p. 79.Google Scholar

48 Nova Scotia Statutes (1918), ch. 22, p. 592.Google Scholar

49 New York Session Laws (1919), ch. 207, p. 798.Google Scholar

50 Ibid. (1920), ch. 794, p. 19134.

51 Ibid. (1918), ch. 508, sec. 117, p. 1627.

52 Ibid. (1920), ch. 741, p. 1806 ff.

53 Connecticut Session Laws (1919), ch. 210, p. 2867.Google Scholar

54 Maine, Public Acts (1919), ch. 38, p. 35.Google Scholar

55 New Jersey Session Laws (1919), ch. 153, p. 340.Google Scholar

56 Massachusetts Acts (1920), ch. 304, p. 321.Google Scholar

57 New York Session Laws (1920), ch. 725, p. 1784.Google Scholar

58 Newfoundland Statutes (1919), ch. 39, p. 117.Google Scholar

59 Statutes of Quebec (1920), ch. 22, p. 69.

60 Ordinance of Province of the Cape of Good Hope (1918), p. 56.

61 Illinois Session Laws (1919), p. 413–14.Google Scholar

62 New Jersey Law Reports, Vol. 81, p. 135.Google Scholar

63 Maryland Acts (1920), ch. 447, p. 154.Google Scholar

64 Rico, PortoStatutes (1919), No. 7, p. 110.Google Scholar

65 Statutes of the U. S., 66th Cong., 2nd Session, ch. 195, p. 614.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.