Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:49:30.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reorganization of the Governmental Structure of Roumania1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Joseph S. Roucek*
Affiliation:
Centenary Junior College, Hackettstown, N.J.

Extract

The law for the reorganization of central administration and the law on local administration (July 20, 1929) sponsored by the National Peasant government of Roumania have recently been put into effect. Both measures were drafted by Professors Negulescu, of the University of Bucharest, and Alexianu, of the University of Cernauţi. Their adoption comprises one of the most thorough governmental reforms in the history of the Balkans.

The structure of the Roumanian government was, until very recently, almost completely copied from the French system. Roumania was a typical example of a unitary organization. The whole power of government was centralized in Bucharest. Practically all powers of local government were derived from the central authority, and were enlarged and contracted at the will of Bucharest. The whole system lent itself admirably to the domination of the National Liberal party, guided up to 1927 by Ion I. C. Brǎtianu, and after his death by his brother, Vintilǎ I. C. Brǎtianu, who died last year.

Since the strength of the National Peasant party, which assumed the reins in 1928, lies largely in the provinces acquired at the close of the World War, a decentralization of government was to be expected. The bitter resentment of Maniu and his associates toward the over-centralization which favored the policies of the Bratianus forced the recent overhauling of the governmental structure, tending toward federalism—a form which takes cognizance of the differences of the past and present between the old kingdom and the new provinces and attempts to extend democratic features of self-rule to the electorate. At the same time, it attempts to secure bureaucratic expertness.

Type
Foreign Governments and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The information presented in this article was secured by the writer during a recent visit to Roumania. Most of it was provided by Mr. Filotti, director of the press bureau of the Presidium of Ministries. Some details can be found in R. A. Egger, “Administrative Reorganization in Roumania,” National Municipal Review, October, 1930, pp. 724-725, and D. Mitrany, “Democracy in the Villages, Manchester Guardian, November 28, 1929, p. 17.

References

2 There are now ten ministries, viz., interior, foreign affairs, finance, justice, education and cults, war, agriculture and domains, industry and commerce, public works, and labor, health, and social welfare.

3 The party committee, however, split on the question. I. G. Duca considered it a premature step to oppose the reform, and the absence of Argetoianu from the Senate when the declaration was read was significant. Averescu's followers ranged themselves with the opposition.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.