Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T02:01:06.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aristotle's Science of the Best Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert C. Bartlett
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

Aristotle's science of the best regime brings to light an almost forgotten hut by no means settled quarrel between reason and faith concerning the best way of life and its political embodiments. Aristotle denies the claimed superiority of divine legislation, in favor of the guidance supplied by unaided reason. Aristotle knows, however, as contemporary political science may not, that only by confronting the divine law as such can science avoid collapsing into dogmatism. The present study attempts to sketch that confrontation by considering Aristotle's analysis of justice—the concern fundamental to both Aristotle and divine law—in order simply to encourage the kind of reflection necessary to reinvigorate rationalism, or that which, according to Aristotle, is closest to the divine in man.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1970a. Aristotele's' Politica. Ed. Dreizhenter, Alois. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1970b. Ethica Nicomachea. Ed. Bywater, Ingram. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1991. Ethica Eudemia. Ed. Walzer, R. R. and Mingay, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. 1959. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Binder, Leonard. 1988. Islamic Liberalism: A Critique of Development Ideologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bluhm, William T. 1962. “The Place of ‘Polir’ in Aristotle's Theory of the Ideal State.” Journal of Politics 24:743–53.Google Scholar
Corbett, Julia M. 1990. Religion in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fortin, Ernest L. 1987. “St. Thomas Aquinas.” In History of Political Philosophy, ed. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph. 3d. ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis. 1956. The Ancient City. New York: Anchor Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hiro, Dilip. 1989. Holy Wars: The Rise of Islamic Fundamentalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B.. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Huxley, George. 1971. “Crete in Aristotle's Politics.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 12:505–15.Google Scholar
Jaffa, Harry V. 1972. “Aristotle.” In History of Political Philosophy, ed. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph. 2d. ed.Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1984. Writings, ed. Peterson, Merrill D.. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Jorstad, Erling. 1987. The New Christian Right 1981–88: Prospects for the Post-Reagan Decade. Lewiston/Queenston: Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
Keaney, John J. 1981. “Aristotle's Politics 2.12 1274a22b–a28.” American Journal of Ancient History VI:97100.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1937. “The Philosophy of Aristotle and the Hellenic-Macedonian Policy.” Ethics 48:1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Ralph and Mahdi, Muhsin. 1972. Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. Ithaca: Cornel] University Press.Google Scholar
Leyden, Wolfgang von. 1967. “Aristotle and the Concept of Law.” Philosophy 42:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Thomas K. 1991. “The ‘god-like man’ versus the ‘best laws’: Politics and Religion in Aristotle's Politics.” Review of Politics 53:488509.Google Scholar
Morrall, John B. 1977. Aristotle. London and Boston: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard G. 1974a. “Aristotle and Absolute Rule.” Antichthon 8:2128.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard G. 1974b. “A Note on Aristotle's Absolute Ruler.” Pftronesis 19:6669.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard G. 1977. Aristotle's Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Naipaul, V. S. 1981. Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Newell, W. R. 1987. “Superlative Virtue: the Problem of Monarchy in Aristotle's Politics.” Western Political Quarterly 40:159–78.Google Scholar
Newman, W. L. 1973. The Politics of Aristotle. 4 vols. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Mary P. 1987. Socrates and the Political Community: An Ancient Debate. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Mary P. 1992. Citizens and Statesmen: A Study of Aristotle's Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. 1992. The Ennobling of Democracy: The Challenge of the Postmodern Age. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. 1986. “Aristotle's Politics in Arabic Philosophy.” In Studies in Arabic Versions of Greek Texts and in Medieval Science [vol. II of Collected Works.]. Leiden and Jerusalem: E.J. Brill and the Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Ponton, Lionel. 1991. “Le divin comme préoccupation politique chez Aristote et Hegel.” In La question de Dieu selon Aristote et Hegel, ed. Konnick, Thomas De and Planty-Bonjour, Guy. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Schroeder, D. N. 1981. “Aristotle on Law.” Polis 4:1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1937. “On Abravane's Philosophical Tendency and Political Teaching.” In Isaac Abravanel, ed. Trend, J.B. and Lowe, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1990. “Some Remarks on the Political Science of Maimonides and Alfarabi.” Interpretation 18:330.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. 1985. “Kingship and Philosophy in Aristotle's Best Regime.” Phronesis 30:249–73.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 1992. Religion and Politics in the United States. 2d ed.Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.