Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:31:31.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Electoral Activity, Constitutional Discourse, and Conceptions of the Individual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Andrew Stark
Andrew Stark
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, constitutional scholars have begun exploring how far constitutional discourse is governed by competing liberal and republican conceptions of the just or the good society. At the same time, political theorists have placed in doubt how far this debate rests on the metaphysical dichotomy between a radically autonomous and a radically encumbered individual. Scholars, however, have yet to investigate to what extent metaphysical conceptions of the autonomous or the encumbered individual underlie and determine strands of constitutional discourse. I analyze the deep structure of constitutional discourse in one important area—the legitimacy of prohibitions on corporate electoral activity. I show that the constitutional argumentation recurrently mounted against corporate electoral activity rests on a particular version of the radically encumbered individual and that the major constitutional defenses of corporate electoral activity assume a particular version of the radically autonomous individual.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 626 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1984. “The Storrs Lectures: Rediscovering the Constitution.” Yale Law Journal 93:1013–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union. 1990. Amicus Curiae Brief. Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce No. 88-1569, 494 U.S. 652.Google Scholar
Ashdown, Gerald G. 1991. “Controlling Campaign Spending and the ‘New Corruption’: Waiting for the Count.” Vanderbilt Law Review 44:767–90.Google Scholar
Associated Industries of Massachusetts. 1977. Amicus Curiae Brief. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti No. 76-1172, 435 U.S. 765.Google Scholar
Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce. 1990. 494 U.S. 652.Google Scholar
“Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce: Addressing a ‘New Corruption’ in Campaign Financing.” 1991. North Carolina Law Review 69:1060–79.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1987. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Backward: Richard Rorty on Liberal Democracy and Philosophy.” Political Theory 15:538–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Roy. 1979. “The Constitutionality of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act after First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.” American University Law Review 28:149–71.Google Scholar
Boggs, Thomas Hale Jr.,, and Boyce, Katharine. 1990. Corporate Political Activity. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
Brudney, Victor. 1981. “Business Corporations and Stockholders' Rights under the First Amendment.” Yale Law Journal 91:235–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, Shelley. 1990. “The Good Citizen's Psyche: On the Psychology of Civic Virtue.” Polity 23:23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Comment.” 1962. Northwestern University Law Review 56:779–95.Google Scholar
“The Constitutionality of the Federal Ban on Corporate and Union Campaign Contributions and Expenditures.” 1974. University of Chicago Law Review 42:146–65.Google Scholar
“Corporate Political Expression.” 1978. Harvard Law Review 92:163–85.Google Scholar
“The Corporation and the Constitution: Economic Due Process and Corporate Speech.” 1981. Yale Law Journal 90:1833–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Archibald. 1980. “Freedom of Expression and the Burger Court.” Harvard Law Review 94:1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Archibald. 1982. “Constitutional Issues in the Regulation of the Financing of Election Campaigns.” Cleveland State Law Review 31:403–42.Google Scholar
Eismeier, Theodore J., and Pollock, Phillip H. III. 1988. Business, Money, and the Rise of Corporate PACs in American Elections. New York: Quorum.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edwin M. 1969. The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edwin M. 1984. “PACs and the Modern Political Process.” In The Impact of the Modern Corporation, ed. Bock, Betty et al. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life. 1986. 479 U.S. 238.Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action Committee. 1985. 470 U.S. 480.Google Scholar
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti. 1978. 435 U.S. 765.Google Scholar
Fleishman, Joel L. 1973. “Freedom of Speech and Equality of Political Opportunity: The Constitutionality of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.” North Carolina Law Review 51:389–483.Google Scholar
Gill, Emily R. 1986. “Goods, Virtues, and the Constitution of the Self.” In Liberals on Liberalism, ed. Damico, Alfonso. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1985. “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:308–22.Google Scholar
Handler, Edward, and Mulkern, John. 1982. Business in Politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Heard, Alexander. 1960. The Costs of Democracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Heymann, Philip B. 1990. “How Government Expresses Public Ideas.” In The Power of Public Ideas, ed. Reich, Robert B.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hinchman, Lewis P. 1990. “The Idea of Individuality: Origins, Meaning, and Political Significance.” Journal of Politics 52:759–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, H. N. 1986. “The Threnody of Liberalism: Constitutional Theory and the Revival of Community.” Political Theory 14:423–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1987. “Republicanism and Liberalism in American Constitutional Thought.” William and Mary Law Review 29:57–74.Google Scholar
International Association of Machinists v. Street. 1961. 367 U.S. 740.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1989. “Democratic Individuality and the Meaning of Rights.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
King, Donald B. 1962. “Corporate Political Spending and the First Amendment.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 23:847–81.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry. 1988. “As If Republicanism.” Yale Law Journal 97:1685–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayton, William T. 1980. “Politics, Money, Coercion, and the Problem with Corporate PACs.” Emory Law Journal 29:375–94.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1986. “The Supreme Court 1985 Term—Foreword: Traces of Self-Government.” Harvard Law Review 100:4–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1988. “Law's Republic.” Yale Law Journal 97:1493–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michigan State Chamber of Commerce. 1989. Brief of Appellee. Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce No. 88-1569. 494 U.S. 652.Google Scholar
Moore, Margaret. 1990. “Justice for Our Times.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:459–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mark. 1990. “What Sort of Ideas Become Public Ideas?” In The Power of Public Ideas, ed. Reich, Robert B.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neal, Patrick, and Paris, David. 1990. “Liberalism and the Communitarian Critique: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:419–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Marlene Arnold. 1980. “The Constitutionality of Federal Restrictions on Corporate and Union Campaign Contributions and Expenditure.” Cornell Law Review 65:945–1010.Google Scholar
Patton, William, and Barrett, Randall. 1981. “Corporate ‘Persons’ and Freedom of Speech: The Political Impact of Legal Mythology.” Wisconsin Law Review 494–512.Google Scholar
“Political Contributions—First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti—Another Hurdle for Shareholder Protection.” 1979. Journal of Corporation Law 4:460–74.Google Scholar
“Political Speech, Inc.: The Bellotti Decision and Corporate Political Spending.” 1977. Suffolk University Law Review 13:1023–64.Google Scholar
Powell, H. Jefferson. 1988. “Reviving Republicanism.” Yale Law Journal 97:1703–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, Robert A. 1981. “Consolidated Edison and Bellotti.” Tulsa Law Journal 16:599–657.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1975. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48:5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:223–51.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amelie O. 1976. “A Literary Postscript: Characters, Persons, Selves, Individuals.” In The Identities of Persons, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1987. Another Liberalism: Romanticism and the Reconstruction of Liberal Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabato, Larry J. 1984. PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1986. “Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers: An Individual-level Analysis of Search and Seizure Cases.” Journal of Politics 48:938–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D.. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 82:557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication.” Virginia Law Review 72:543–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Steven. 1980. “Government Speech.” University of California, Los Angeles Law Review 27:565–655.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1991. “Redeeming American Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 85:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, John S. 1985. “Direct Democracy, Campaign Finance, and the Courts: Can Corruption, Undue Influence, and Declining Voter Turnout Be Found?” University of Miami Law Review 39:377–428.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism’, and the Future of Public Law.” American Political Science Review 82:89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1984. “Who's in Charge? Accountability in Political Action Committees.” Political Science Quarterly 99:591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1986. “Caught in a Political Thicket: The Supreme Court and Campaign Finance.” Constitutional Commentary 3:97–121.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. 1988. “Rainbow Republicanism.” Yale Law Journal. 97:1713–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97:1539–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1991a. “Preferences and Politics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20:3–34.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1991b. “The Spirit of the Laws.” New Republic, 11 March 1991, pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal 1981. “Personal Attribute Models of Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978.” American Political Science Review 75:355–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thigpen, Robert, and Downing, Lyle A.. 1987. “Liberalism and the Communitarian Critique.” American Journal of Political Science 31:637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States v. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562. 1970. 434 F.2d. 1116 (8th Cir.).Google Scholar
Vandegrift, Benjamin M. 1980. “The Corporate Political Action Committee.” New York University Law Review 55:422–71.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael 1990. “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” Political Theory 18:6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Ralph K. Jr.,, and Bolton, John R.. 1973. Campaign Financing and Political Freedom. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Wright, J. Skelly. 1982. “Money and the Pollution of Politics: Is the First Amendment an Obstacle to Political Equality?” Columbia Law Review 82:609–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.