Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:38:07.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic Ideals and Republican Institutions in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Benoy Kumar Sarkar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To appreciate the political theories and institutions of Asia in the proper historical perspective, it is necessary to remember that, in spite of Switzerland, universal suffrage and the initiative and referendum are essentially young phenomena in Eur-America; and that republicanism cannot be pronounced to be a historic trait of the occidental mind.

On the other hand, it is apparent that the liberal political movements in Young Asia have, if at all, only very remote blood-relationship with the theories and institutions developed in its past history. The Japanese constitutional monarchy, the ideals of the Young Turk, the Chinese republic, as well as the nationalist activities in Egypt, Persia and India, are chiefly based on the modern Eur-American achievements. These sources can be briefly mentioned as: (1) the English parliament, (2) the American federation, (3) the “ideas of 1789,” (4) the idealism of Fichte and Schiller, (5) the socialism of Karl Marx and Louis Blanc, (6) the political mysticism of Joseph Mazzini, and, last but not least, (7) the philosophy and methodology of John Stuart Mill.

Within these limitations it should be possible to define the rightful place of the Asians in a scientific study of comparative politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , November 1918 , pp. 581 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ch. xlix (Sale's translation).

2 Visnu Purana, Ch. xvii.

3 Pt. ii, Bk. II, ch. i, 6; ch. ii, 17, 18; Pt. iv, Bk. III. (Legge's trans.)

4 Bk. I, Pt. ii, ch. iv, 10; ch. viii, 2, 3; Bk. V, Pt. i, ch. v, 8; Pt. ii, ch. ix, 1.

5 Simcox's, Primitive Civilizations, Vol. II, p. 18.Google Scholar

6 Ch. i, lines 375–376; Ch. iv, sec. ii, line 259. My English translation of Sukra-niti is based on the Sanskrit text edited by Oppert, and forms Vol. XIII of The Sacred Books of the Hindus (Panini Office, Allahabad; Agents: Luzac and Co., London).

7 I, 10, 18, 1, The Sacred Books of the Ease (ed. Max Müller).

8 Ch. viii, verse 336.

9 Ch. i, lines 745, 746.

10 Ch. i, line 755.

11 Hopkins', “Social and Military Position of the Ruling Caste in Ancient India as Represented by the Sanskrit Epic” in the Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. XIII, 1883, pp. 143, 144, etc.Google Scholar

12 The Artha-shastra, Book V, Ch. iv (Shamasastry's, trans, in the Indian Antiquary, 1909–1910Google Scholar).

13 Ch. ii, lines 5, 6, 7, 8.

14 Ch. 220, verse 37.

15 Ch. 225, verse 18.

16 Neeti, Ch. xi, verse 75 (Sanskrit text in the Bibliotheca Indica Series).

17 Book I (Shamasastry's, trans, in the Mysore Review, 1906–1908Google Scholar).

18 Ch. ii, lines 163, 164.

19 Ch. ii, lines 515, 516.

20 Ch. iv, Sec. vii, 830–833, 838, 839.

21 Book XIII, ch. lxi, 32.

22 Ch. vii, verses 111, 112.

23 Ch. ii, lines 549–552.

24 Mencius, Book VII, Part I, xxxi.

25 Bea's, Buddhist Records, Vol. II, p. 166.Google Scholar

26 From Gerson to Grotius, p. 31.

27 Jayaswa's, Kashiprasad “Introduction to Hindu Polity” in the Modern Review, Calcutta, May–July, 1913Google Scholar; Narendranath Law's “Forms and Types of States in Ancient India” in the same journal, September, 1917.

28 Megasthenes', Fragments, L, LVIGoogle Scholar; Hopkins', article in the Journal of the American Oriental Society, XIII, 136.Google Scholar

29 VII, 3, 14.

30 Shanti-parva, ch. cvii, verses 30–32.

31 Davids', RhysBuddhist India, pp. 22, 41.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., Ch. ii.

33 Ibid., Ch. ii.

34 Dialogues of the Buddha, Vol. II (translated by Davids, Rhys).Google Scholar

35 Smith's, “Position of the Autonomous Tribes of the Punjab” in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Sonety, 1903, pp. 685–702.Google Scholar

36 McCrindle's, Invasion of India by Alexander (ed. 1896), p. 296.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., p. 406.

38 Book XI, ch. i, The Indian Antiquary, 1910, pp. 116–118. Mr. Shamasastry translates gana by “corporation.” The context requires that it should be “republic.”

39 VI, 64 (ed. and trans. Whitney and Lanman).

40 Atharva Veda, II, 27.

41 Atharva Veda, VII, 12.

42 I, 3, 14.

43 III, 4.

44 Atharva Veda, III, 3.

45 Shatapatha Brahmana, XII, 9, 3, 3 (The Sacred Books of the East).

46 Jayaswal's, “Rituals at Hindu Coronation: their Constitutional Aspects” in the Modern Review, Calcutta, January, 1912.Google Scholar

47 Hopkins', article in the Journal of the American Oriental Society, XIII, pp. 137, 139, 143.Google Scholar

48 Mahabharata, Shanti-parva, Ch. lix, verses 106, 107.

49 Ibid., lxvii, 17, 24.

50 Compare the significance of oaths in Carlyle's, Medieval Political Theory, Vol. III, 39–40.Google Scholar

51 Epigraphia Indica, VIII, 43.

52 Bea's, Si-yu-ki, Vol. I, pp. 210–211.Google Scholar

53 Banerji's, RakhaldasMemoir on the Palas of Bengal, p. 45Google Scholar (published by the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta).

54 Asakawa's, “Contributions of Feudal Japan to New Japan” in the Journal of Race Development, July, 1912Google Scholar; Ashley's, Surveys Historic and Economic, pp. 92–106, 147–151, 152–156Google Scholar; Gomme's, Primitive Folk-moots, 20–69Google Scholar, and Village Community, 233; Stubbs', Constitutional History, Vol. I, p. 34Google Scholar; Seebohm's, English Village Community, 437–441Google Scholar; Maine's, Village Communities in the East and West (ed. 1876), pp. 122–126.Google Scholar

55 For traces of Hindu republics about seven centuries later than this date see Smith's, Early History of India (ed. 1914), p. 286.Google Scholar

56 Epigraphia Zeylanica, Vol. I, no. 9; Vol. II, no. 5.

57 Beal's, Si-yu-ki, Vol. I, p. 107.Google Scholar

58 Rhys Davids' Buddhist India, Ch. iii.

59 Madras Epigraphy, 1909–1910, p. 98, cited in Matthai's, Village Government in British India, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar

60 Matthai, Ibid.

61 History of India, Vol. I, ch. ii; Report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons, 1832, Vol. III, App. 84, p. 131.

62 Chambers', Mediaeval Stage, Vol. I, 55Google Scholar, Vol. II, 111–115, 258–262; Unwin's, Gilds and Companies of London, 110–127, 267–293Google Scholar, etc.

63 Werner's Chinese Sociology, Table II.

64 Macgowan's, article in the North China Branch of the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1886, New Series, Vol. XXI, pp. 133–192.Google Scholar

65 Morse's, Gilds of China, pp. 9, 12.Google Scholar

66 Rhys Davids' Buddhist India, Ch. vi.

67 Banerjea's, PramathanathPublic Administration in Ancient India, p. 271.Google Scholar

68 Shamasastry's, “Chanakya's Land and Revenue Policy” in the Indian Antiquary, 1905, p. 56.Google Scholar

69 Hopkins', India Old and New, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar

70 Birdwood's, Industrial Arts of India, pp. 138–140Google Scholar, etc., cited in Coomaraswamy's, AnandaIndian Craftsman, pp. 8–12Google Scholar (Note the references to the regulation of the hours of labor, unemployment, etc.).

71 Shookra-neeti, Ch. iv, sec. v, lines 606–608.

72 Ibid., iv, v, 614–615.

73 “Legal Procedure” (The Sacred Books of the East).

74 Ibid., Ch. i, verses 28–31.

75 Jolly's, Minor Law Books, Part I, pp. 346–350.Google Scholar

76 Ch. iv, v, lines 59–60.

77 Ch. i, verse 118.

78 Ch. iv, v, lines 89–91.

79 Ch. iv, v, line 35.

80 The “corporation law” relating to the constitution of gilds and public associations is given by Brihaspati (Ch. xvii, verses, 5, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 24).

81 Davids', RhysBuddhist India, p. 97.Google Scholar

82 Brissaud's, History of French Public Law, p. 253Google Scholar; Gross', Gild Merchant, Vol. I, pp. 105, 159–162Google Scholar, etc. Compare Brihaspati in note 80 and Birdwood in note 70. Vide also Hopkins', India Old and New, pp. 193–196Google Scholar (jurisdiction of the gilds).

83 Pp. 70–74, 106, 108–111, etc.

84 Cf. Williams, , The Middle Kingdom, Vol. I, pp. 395–500.Google Scholar Tocqueville's adverse criticism of the centralization under the ancien régime (Brissaud's, History of French Public Law, p. 396Google Scholar) would apply with no less force to the centralization of rural communes under the Kautilyan imperialism (“Chanakya's Land and Revenue Policy,” by Shamasastry, in the Indian Antiquary, 1905, pp. 7, 8Google Scholar).

85 Studies in Ancient Hindu Polity, Vol. I, pp. 106–114.

86 Smith's, Early History of India (ed. 1914), 132.Google Scholar

87 Law's, Hindu Polity, Vol. I, pp. 117–121.Google Scholar

88 Narada, I, II, in Jolly's Minor Law Books.

89 Cambridge Modern History, Vol. VIII, ch. ii, p. 49.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.